01-02-2011, 04:24 PM
Jim,
I could not agree with you more heartily regarding the Chicago evidence. My hypothesis has ZERO effect on its immense significance.
Ditto the "shameful" handling of Black's piece by rather, well, shameful people.
In re Bill's Rex and November 1 triple header hypothesis: I've long said that "consider the timing" is for our investigations what "follow the money" was for Watergate: a directing mantra. So I share your sense of the general significance of these connected phenomena.
It's just that I remain at a loss to understand how the Kelly hypothesis falsifies the Drago hypothesis in this instance.
BTW, a few years ago I found the Black piece on a now-forgotten Internet site. It was my first reading of it, and I thought it ended abruptly at a point where, if memory serves, Black is writing about returning to Chicago.
Are you able to direct us to an on-line version of the piece?
Thanks,
Charles
I could not agree with you more heartily regarding the Chicago evidence. My hypothesis has ZERO effect on its immense significance.
Ditto the "shameful" handling of Black's piece by rather, well, shameful people.
In re Bill's Rex and November 1 triple header hypothesis: I've long said that "consider the timing" is for our investigations what "follow the money" was for Watergate: a directing mantra. So I share your sense of the general significance of these connected phenomena.
It's just that I remain at a loss to understand how the Kelly hypothesis falsifies the Drago hypothesis in this instance.
BTW, a few years ago I found the Black piece on a now-forgotten Internet site. It was my first reading of it, and I thought it ended abruptly at a point where, if memory serves, Black is writing about returning to Chicago.
Are you able to direct us to an on-line version of the piece?
Thanks,
Charles