The Chicago Plot: A Hypothesis

[Bill Kelly]

I think doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

I'm not sure the people have no legal bearing. We live under a contract called "We The People". It's time to do a margin call on it with the American Government.

I think it's safe to say that even if the Dallas DA entered a case that it would end up with some cheesy decision, like the ones they specialize in, where they came to the conclusion that, yes, there was a conspiracy but nothing could be done about it now. And that isn't good enough.

Bill Kelly: Well, there has never been a Dallas Grand Jury of ordinary citizens review the evidence in either Tippir or JFK murders, take the sworn testimony of witnesses and suspects and determine if there is evidence enough to indict anyone and bring them to trial. That's the way the Constitution says that homicides should be investigated. How can you say that it would be a "cheey decision" when its never been done? It never could have been done with Wade in there, but with Watkins, who believes there was a conspiracy, there's a window of opportunity to see what would happen if the law was practiced as it should be. You're predetermination that it would be "cheesy" and "not good enough" is just your opinion and not based on anything since the proper legal functions have never been carried out.

Nope, the people need to make clear the US Government is no long credible or reliable towards check and balance democracy and the Kennedy case is a prime example.

BK: Well it should be made an example by applying the law to the case and not used as an example by not applying the law because you can't trust the government. We've already said we didn't trust DA Wade and now we got a new DA Watkins, who was not part of the old machine, who is reviewing old cases and changing their verdicts and he should be deemed reliable enough to handle at least a review of the Tippit case.

I think it has to be made clear that government has proven itself unreliable in the processing of the Kennedy Assassination evidence and cannot be allowed to be the authority over it in future cases.

BK: What future cases? We're still trying to get the first Dallas grand jury to ever look into the Tippit case and what happened at Dealey Plaza, and it's still the same case. If JFK and Tippit were properly handled MLK and RFK probably wouldn't have happened, and such "future cases" can be prevented by solving the old ones.

That the people need to intervene on the basis of their Constitutional right and justice needs to finally be done on this matter.

BK: Exactly, and the Constitution says that the evidence in homicides goes to a grand jury, and that's where justice can and must be done, a grand jury of ordinary citizens who review the evidence and make the determination as to whether indictments should be brought.

At the very least we could force them to show that there is no real democracy in this country and the government is actually run by military and right-wing neo-fascist powers under a false democracy. One that is sticking with its killing of president Kennedy.

BK: You can still do that and have a grand jury too. If the JFK case is to be resolved to a legal and moral certainty it must go before a grand jury.

This is long overdue...

And that's the way it works.