Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
McAdams Bear Droppings
#1
Out of curiosity I scanned McAdams' website and read his material. I can't believe what a dedicated obfuscator and liar that man is. Is he hired by CIA to do disinformation?

If you read his criticism of Douglass he makes many overtures of showing how Douglass commits the usual conspiracy theorist offenses with the suggestion that they have long been disproven. However if you read McAdams you realize he's implying a huge assumption of proven argument when, if you look closely, no such proof is ever provided. McAdams' trick is to argue at length the conspiracy violations committed and refer to alleged Lone Nut arguments that have disproven them, but once you are done with his voluminous submission you realize he never got around to actually saying anything or specifically showing why it wasn't true. McAdams is a major prevaricator with bad intent. I won't print my bear pit description of him.

Just from reading McAdams I can see right away what he is. He's a government disinformation agent put on the internet to provide enough verbal material to point to a counter opinion. Forget the fact that McAdams' fodder is completely void of any substantive content. Its purpose is just to be there so the denialists and truth saboteurs can point to something to validate themselves by. This dubious body of information will then be referenced as the winning side by official sources controlled by the government. I see Google places McAdams prominently in the Google search. Google is obviously influenced by CIA.

A perfect example of McAdams' insidious dishonesty is his article 'debunking' the hypnosis theories on Oswald. After reading a long offering of mendacious diversion from truth I realized McAdams never mentions Jensen - one of the main witnesses to Oswald's claimed MK-ULTRA experience. What the casual public doesn't know is that McAdams is a deliberate deceiver and fact-omitter. The whole purpose of McAdams, his website, and effort is to create a place for deniers to practice their denial. McAdams and his website are clearly a "dark-side" venue. He and his site are merely there to make sure the evil murderers of president Kennedy are concealed and protected.

I read two long debunking pieces on McAdams' website. I couldn't get half-way through either one without having to quit reading further due to the toxic nature of the material.


.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
McAdams Bear Droppings - by Albert Doyle - 27-02-2011, 06:05 PM
McAdams Bear Droppings - by Charles Drago - 27-02-2011, 09:38 PM
McAdams Bear Droppings - by Magda Hassan - 28-02-2011, 05:57 AM
McAdams Bear Droppings - by Albert Doyle - 01-03-2011, 05:38 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  McAdams gets new life Tom Bowden 3 16,496 11-07-2018, 01:05 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  McAdams loses Round Two Jim DiEugenio 5 8,116 19-08-2017, 09:26 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  John McAdams and Marquette go to Court Jim DiEugenio 0 1,859 21-09-2016, 02:50 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  McAdams, JFK Facts, and "Moderation" Jim DiEugenio 67 22,828 03-10-2015, 03:49 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  The Lies of Colby: New Spartacus? McAdams... Jim DiEugenio 104 33,274 26-07-2015, 05:21 AM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  More on Mcadams vs Abbate Jim DiEugenio 1 2,552 21-05-2015, 01:41 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  John McAdams Part 2 Jim DiEugenio 31 13,477 29-08-2013, 02:40 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  John McAdams part 1 Jim DiEugenio 56 16,274 26-08-2013, 02:49 AM
Last Post: Rob Caprio
  December Programs at The Sixth Floor Museum with John McAdams and Gary Mack Bernice Moore 0 2,520 03-12-2011, 02:34 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  David Mantik vs. John McAdams Jim DiEugenio 2 3,708 29-11-2011, 05:42 AM
Last Post: Phil Dragoo

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)