01-03-2011, 05:38 PM
The one thing McAdams does that he should be roasted in Hades for is casually make a case on his website for Bolden being guilty. He does so by casually omitting all the relevant material for Bolden's frame-up. The main advantage these prominent conspiracy deniers have is they ignore or omit all of the conspiracy evidence because they take a position it isn't real so therefore they don't have to address or acknowledge it. Their material therefore gains the appearance of believability because it never touches that which shows it to be untrue.
I'm against thought crimes laws, but if ever there were any in America these people would be the first to whom they should be applied. Of course, the ones they intend to apply them against are us.
.
I'm against thought crimes laws, but if ever there were any in America these people would be the first to whom they should be applied. Of course, the ones they intend to apply them against are us.
.