26-10-2012, 12:49 AM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:David
That's the point of my transcribing Zavada's paragraph: here is the typical; the most important film of the 20th century is atypical.
Absence of 0183 indicates forgery.
Absence of 0184 is tossed off as "automatic advance"--a mechanical anomaly, not the existence of another film not extant.
This of course is consistent with Zavada's verbose The-Dog-Ate-The-Film-But-The-Vomitus-Is-Authentic.
Your demonstration of the inconsistencies and arithmetical analysis indicates forgery.
I mean, come on--the camera had a 24fps setting and a 48fps setting but "Zapruder's camera ran at 18.3fps"--
--and this warm wetness on America's leg is rain.
CD Jackson left the scene, so can't answer questions.
McMahon saw eight shots from three directions.
Hollywood professionals go coffee-through-the-nose when they see the bubblegum wound inflate/deflate w/zero splatter.
This film doesn't rise to the values of I Caught Bigfoot Skipping Through The Woods.
Let's go a little further Phil... I think we can even figure our how it was altered and refilmed... (btw - it was 16 and 48 fps, not 24 if I rememebr correctly)
If there was alteration with information removed… the Original film HAD to have more frames 48fps is the only other option to 16fps
In the Archive Horne tells us we have 6'3", 75", of film that contains Assassination imagery... what we do not learn from his statement is whether he means 486 total frames or just from 133-486 = 353 frames
Regular 8mm frame dimensions
Camera aperture size (HxW): 3.68 x 4.88mm
Frame area: 17.96sq. mm (3.68x4.88)
Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
16:9 useable frame area: 13.4sq. mm (75%)
normal frame rate: 16fps
3.68mm = .14488 inches PER FRAME
75" of film = 517 frames / 18.3 = 28.25 seconds of film
Zapruder was 486 frames / 18.3 = 26.56 seconds of film
28.25-26.56= 1.69 seconds of film missing at 18.3 if Hornes measurement is accurate
(QUESTION for anyone: how many frames of developed images are there on the A SIDE of the film, the PERSONAL SIDE and pre motorcade frames…? I've seen the numbers somewhere but can't put my hands on them Horne says there were about 177 frames shot pre-motorcade…25.6 inches of film on side B and that SIDE A was filled completely)
That is the only imagery on the 33'1"of film that makes up the "IN CAMERA ORIGINAL" (btw a blank spool has 25 feet of useable film per side, not 33, the final length will include leaders and such placed film at processing.)
75" has images, then there are 2 spliced sections of completely BLANK FILM (not leader, film) HOW CAN ANYONE CLAIM THIS IS AN IN CAMERA ORIGINAL when the "0183" and "Processed by KODAK" edge printing is NOT on this film as well?
Anyway,
486 frames of film = 26.56 seconds of film at 18.3, at 48fps = 1275 frames (IF the entire film was taken at 48fps since the camera easily switched from 16 to 48 fps, it is virtually impossible to tell when this would have been on and off)
No let me make a point while asking a question… if one was to take a 48fps shot film and removed the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] and 3[SUP]rd[/SUP] frame from each 3 frame segment, wouldn't this now look like a film shot at 16fps ? The distance between frame exposures goes from 1/48[SUP]th[/SUP] to 1/16[SUP]th[/SUP] of second and what we see in frames 1/4/7/10/13 on a 48fps film SHOULD BE the same as frames 1/2/3/4/5 on a 16fps film of the same event from the same location.
If frames 1/4/7/10/13 are placed next to each other, run at 16 and RE-filmed at 16fps, wouldn't the IS area of these frames ALSO BE 1/16[SUP]th[/SUP] of a second apart?
So why 18.3fps and how does the NPIC even know to consider 18fps THAT weekend?
LIFE has already provided NPIC, by Sunday evening, the frames, at 18fps, on which shots are seen: 190/264/312… Doesn't this suggest that "264" is the SBT seen at 224 how are they 40 frames off?
To recap:
A film at 48fps would look exactly like a 16fps film if we were to remove the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP]/3[SUP]rd[/SUP] frames from each 3 frame sequence
There are enough frames per second at 48fps to create a believable 18.3fps final film and still remove almost 2/3's of the frames.
There SHOULD BE 517 frames worth of exposed film in 6'3"… there are only 480 frames in the extant portion of the assassination (6 damaged frames 156/7, 208/9/10/11)
Not every bit of the film needed to be filmed at 48fps…. Yet there are tell-tale signs of alteration…
1 no Stop/Start indication at z133
2 break at 156
3 break at 207
4 damage/replacement at z341, z350
5 no IS area on 486
Adding now Altgens claiming the headshot was right in front of him… and I'm pretty confident that 156 350 was originally 48fps…
I just can't decide whether Z would film the whole thing at one speed to allow for any changes needed… or not.
132 to 133 is about how much time? At 48fps there are plenty of frames to choose the right one to be 133… and to remove ALL the excess… 5 seconds(?) of film at 48fps is 240 frames, PLUS the 2 of 3 frames between 1-132 & 133-156 to get the speed to 18.3.
We can deal with 157-207 and 212 thri 350 once we have a few answers here...
DJ