12-12-2012, 03:16 AM
I posted the following comments today. Note the timestamps. My first post (the one on the bottom of this message) to Jim (Fetzer) is in response to his own post wherein he suggests that my objections to his thesis are founded in the fact that I have not forgiven him for his breach of etiquette toward me and my wife. My second reply is to someone named James. Note that my post to James was almost immediately approved, but my reply to Fetzer still has not been approved. There is nothing objectionable in my language nor in my tone. I am simply reporting the truth. Yet--it is censored.
A word to the wise...
Greg BurnhamDecember 11, 2012 - 2:47 pm
James,
I assure you that I want Fetzer and co to be correct! If we could show LHO in the doorway of the TSBD buildingespecially for the benefit of those who are not up to speed on the VOLUMES of other compelling exculpatory evidencethen that would be great. The issue goes far beyond that, however. It is not enough that such wishful thinking is in our Hope Chest. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
===============================
Greg BurnhamDecember 11, 2012 - 2:11 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Jim,
First off, the reason I asked my wife to look at Altgens 6 and to give her impression is because you had claimed "ANYONE CAN SEE THAT DOORMAN IS OSWALD." I challenged that claim since I and many others could not easily see any such thing. I asked my wife to look at the photo and give an opinion precisely BECAUSE she has no dog in this fight and is honest to a fault. She didn't say Doorman was or was not Oswald. She said she couldn't tell. She said the photo was too obscure to make those determinations TO HER EYE.
The offense you committed against me and my wife occurred when you said: "I can't believe you would commit a fraud against your own wife!" I have not forgiven it because you have not, publicly or privately, asked for forgivenessnot apologizednot even admitted an offense was committed. If and when you apologize you might be surprised at how forgiving I am.
GO_SECURE
monk
A word to the wise...
Greg BurnhamDecember 11, 2012 - 2:47 pm
James,
I assure you that I want Fetzer and co to be correct! If we could show LHO in the doorway of the TSBD buildingespecially for the benefit of those who are not up to speed on the VOLUMES of other compelling exculpatory evidencethen that would be great. The issue goes far beyond that, however. It is not enough that such wishful thinking is in our Hope Chest. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
===============================
Greg BurnhamDecember 11, 2012 - 2:11 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Jim,
First off, the reason I asked my wife to look at Altgens 6 and to give her impression is because you had claimed "ANYONE CAN SEE THAT DOORMAN IS OSWALD." I challenged that claim since I and many others could not easily see any such thing. I asked my wife to look at the photo and give an opinion precisely BECAUSE she has no dog in this fight and is honest to a fault. She didn't say Doorman was or was not Oswald. She said she couldn't tell. She said the photo was too obscure to make those determinations TO HER EYE.
The offense you committed against me and my wife occurred when you said: "I can't believe you would commit a fraud against your own wife!" I have not forgiven it because you have not, publicly or privately, asked for forgivenessnot apologizednot even admitted an offense was committed. If and when you apologize you might be surprised at how forgiving I am.
GO_SECURE
monk
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)