Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi

[Charles Drago]

A major problem is starkly rendered here:

To my knowledge, Morley has yet to declare publicly that he acknowledges the fact of conspiracy in the death of JFK. Thus, Morley stands as a significant asset for those who would maintain and strengthen the cover-up.

For as we should know by now, the cover-up's primary goal is NOT to convince the world that LHO, acting alone, killed JFK. Rather, it is to maintain the doubt upon which the few base their control of the many.

If I'm wrong about Morley, please enlighten me ASAP with verifiable citationz of his statement(s) to the contrary.

Thank you.

Three years ago i read Morley's book, "Our Man in Mexico" and i contacted him to ask him some questions about the book.
I also asked him if he agreed with John Newman's conclusion that Angleton was the bad apple that designed the mexico incident.
He replied that Newman was right about Angleton. He does not agree with Lamar Waldron's C-day scenario and the Almeida story.
He does not believe that wealthy individuals have anything to do with the assassination, who no matter how much money they have,
they were not capable of such actions, and responsible are those with knowledge of psycological warfare and protected by official secrecy.

Interesting.

Morley, if you are accurate in stating his assessment of "wealthy individuals," does not appear to conduct his JFK investigation based upon a viable conspiracy model.

Most "wealthy individuals" are not skilled boat builders, yet they own yachts.

And does Morley seriously suggest that the "wealthy individuals" of whom we speak are not "protected by official secrecy"?