Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi
#30
Fetzer: Mossad Played a Crucial Role in 911 Attacks:

http://www.iranreview.org/content/Docume...ttacks.htm

According to Dr. Fetzer, George W. Bush and his administration officials were responsible for the atrocities which happened on September 11, 2001. He firmly believes that Israel's Mossad was involved in the 9/11 attacks and that the U.S. government tries to withhold this truth from the public; however, he has written tens of articles for different magazines and news websites, providing evidence of the involvement of Israel's intelligence service in the attacks.

Fetzer:

Did Mossad death squads slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?

When Press TV published my submission, they selected their own title, "Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook". I would have used, "Did Mossad death squads' slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?" No matter how provocative the title, however, there remains every reason to believe that what I wrote about Sandy Hookand the pattern that this atrocity appears to reflectis overwhelmingly closer to the truth than what we are being told by our own national press, which is displaying its profound prejudice against accuracy in media.

Phil's note:

Oh, quite a difference there--Press TV headlined the libel in the declarative case; Fetzer would've slimed by with the subjunctive.

Tallying the score, Mossad did JFK, 911 and Sandy Hook--and that's just what "researchers" like Fetzer tell us--

Hence, when 50th anniversary commentaries begin issuing in November, Fetzer will go to the head of the line to discount any questioning of the official propaganda.

Behold a provocateur, disinformation to discredit, disrupt, dial up the dissonance.

Hence, to Fetzer:

(fett-sir) vt: To FUBAR with extreme prejudice. 2. To bristle with petulant pedantry, respond with jellyfish sting, while dispensing auras and penumbras of squid dye No. 4 and tauntological sophistry.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi - by Phil Dragoo - 05-01-2013, 12:23 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Morley Praises Kamp But Avoids Mentioning Prayer Man Brian Doyle 1 578 09-09-2023, 06:02 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,552 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 366,190 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  Bill Kelly on Angleton, Jefferson Morley, and Thomas Powers Anthony Thorne 5 13,731 11-06-2019, 04:50 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Rex Bradford's Report on Trump and the JFK Act Jim DiEugenio 0 13,414 03-07-2018, 10:43 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Jim DiEugenio reviews Jeff Morley's The Ghost Jim DiEugenio 14 12,966 03-04-2018, 05:14 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 71,314 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Morley Wins Decision Albert Doyle 5 4,314 30-01-2016, 10:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  How Credible is the Markham Tape? Herbert Blenner 4 3,602 26-11-2014, 07:02 PM
Last Post: Herbert Blenner
  JFK Lancer: Conversations, Rex Bradford Alan Dale 0 3,184 12-11-2014, 08:03 PM
Last Post: Alan Dale

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)