18-03-2013, 09:52 PM
Sorry you feel that way Greg....
In My world, pronouns are for people who dont have the information and dont want to bother doing the work.
PEOPLE, WE and THEY in the context of this conversation is worthless...
If CD is to make a statement that PEOPLE will behave in a certain way... and then ask WHY that is so... "How was this movement justified?"
Is it not important to know WHO these "PEOPLE" are in forming a response?
He presents a question with the solution built in... that's called a tautology...
Since "this" is happening, "THAT" must be the response,... and CD is asking "how?"
Asking what evidence there is that "THIS" is happening in the first place - is out of line?
Assuming THAT when "THIS" has yet to be proven is what we are so wary of to begin with, no?
I'm not crying foul Greg.... I am asking the man to qualify his conclusion from which he asks the question...
as I am saying there were no PEOPLE needing to be "mollified" to begin with.
NOt a single soul crys out, "What are we going to do to get back at those Cuban/Russian commies who helped Oswald kill JFK"
And I've already stated that "LONE NUT" only comes into being thru the FBI report's conclusion.
Truth be told.... PEOPLE knew it was the CIA's banana republic take-over team the entire time... and NOBODY was EVER going to ask those questions.
You want to make this more complicated, fine.... but I see CD taking what Peter Scott wrote and twisting it into some strange, pronoun laced question rather than looking at the who/what/where/when and how of Phase 1 and Phase 2 and understanding what was actually taking place.
He knows everything Greg... on every subject and every thread.... and y'all chuckle and look the other way while rolling your eyes... meanwhile those of us who are actually interested in learning something are accused....
He takes the fun and enjoyment out of being inquisitive, of wanting to hear something of substance... out of just being here.
If I'm alone in these feelings... so be it... but if challenging/questioning the man is just not allowed... screw it.
I'm done. :banghead:
In My world, pronouns are for people who dont have the information and dont want to bother doing the work.
PEOPLE, WE and THEY in the context of this conversation is worthless...
If CD is to make a statement that PEOPLE will behave in a certain way... and then ask WHY that is so... "How was this movement justified?"
Is it not important to know WHO these "PEOPLE" are in forming a response?
He presents a question with the solution built in... that's called a tautology...
Since "this" is happening, "THAT" must be the response,... and CD is asking "how?"
Asking what evidence there is that "THIS" is happening in the first place - is out of line?
Assuming THAT when "THIS" has yet to be proven is what we are so wary of to begin with, no?
I'm not crying foul Greg.... I am asking the man to qualify his conclusion from which he asks the question...
as I am saying there were no PEOPLE needing to be "mollified" to begin with.
NOt a single soul crys out, "What are we going to do to get back at those Cuban/Russian commies who helped Oswald kill JFK"
And I've already stated that "LONE NUT" only comes into being thru the FBI report's conclusion.
Truth be told.... PEOPLE knew it was the CIA's banana republic take-over team the entire time... and NOBODY was EVER going to ask those questions.
You want to make this more complicated, fine.... but I see CD taking what Peter Scott wrote and twisting it into some strange, pronoun laced question rather than looking at the who/what/where/when and how of Phase 1 and Phase 2 and understanding what was actually taking place.
He knows everything Greg... on every subject and every thread.... and y'all chuckle and look the other way while rolling your eyes... meanwhile those of us who are actually interested in learning something are accused....
He takes the fun and enjoyment out of being inquisitive, of wanting to hear something of substance... out of just being here.
If I'm alone in these feelings... so be it... but if challenging/questioning the man is just not allowed... screw it.
I'm done. :banghead:
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter