Technical Hurdles Suggest Extensive Z-Film Alteration Highly Unlikely

[David Josephs]

So, we either have: a) an authentic film that shows evidence of a conspiracy, or b) a faked film that shows evidence of a conspiracy.

Same thing with the autopsy: a) either the wounds were altered and some witnesses were pressured to lie or b) the photos and x-rays were altered and some witnesses were pressured to lie.

And we're fighting about this? No wonder some people think we're kooks.

Amen. Some people need to argue for argument's sake it would seem.

Yup... or some of us want to understand the processes so we can identify the cast members to figure out the players from the played.
The only people who think we're kooks are the same people barring us from Dealey Plaza... you believe they will EVER take this anymore seriosuly than branding us kooks as often and as loudly as possible?

They call us kooks out of fear and from established tactics... Seeing these threads as FIGHTS rather than debates contributing to the knowledge base is frankly surprising.
===

Surgeon General of the Navy Kenney was with Humes and others when the 6:35 body arrived and thru the "alteration of the wounds"..... player or played?
Admiral Galloway delayed McHugh out front and got into the "decoy" ambulance with the casket... player or played?
Admiral Burkley - too many things to even name... player or played?

Chief Rowley has an 8mm film the night of the assassination which disappears to history... player or played?
Chief Rowley invents CE399... player or played?
Zapruder copies begin with 0185 and end with 0187, both of which do NOT appear on the films... player of played?

These are the DEEP questions from the DEEP POLITICS FORUM.... telling us the SPRING and FPS are the causes for the film in the Archives is insulting to anyone with a brain...
he was called on it... Help us or defend him... I posted how willing I am to learn anything that is offered with sufficient backing..

He stands by his posts.


Dawn...
Ask please once,
ask please twice,
ask yet again to please expand and explain... HELP us understand
and we get "sorry, that's your problem - I stick by what I posted"

what would you have us do... say thanks and let it stand?

If the posting members themselves cannot differentiate between "fighting" and "debate" in order to clarify the record... or expose attacks
what are we doing here...


----

Tracy -

what we have is a film that is regarded as THE most accurate representation of the assasination with not only a dubious possession chain, but obvious alterations from what was seen on the film that weekend as well what was seen on the ground and corroborated by multiple witnesses.

Let's just say for a second it IS authentic... AND shows evidence of more than one shooter, a conspiracy. Since 1975 not a single Mass Media entity has said so, has even tore it apart to SHOW us.
Have you seen the Discovery Channel's, "How the Zapruder film PROVES there was a conspiracy" TV special? of course not cause there will never be one...

The conspiracy is NOT the film or the autopsy report which are the props, the minutia... the conspiracy is, "You're going to believe US, NOT your lying eyes" for coming on 50 years...
and you have no idea who US is...

----

I will apologize now if my style and passion for the subject matter has offended anyone...

I felt I was polite and direct in my replies and requests until it became obvious there was another agenda...
I was then joined by those with much more experience with that kind of situation... with the same requests for the substance behind the thoughts

Do we maintain some minimum standard for the information posted here AS FACT...
or should we simply nod approvingly at anything thrown against the wall...

If not here, where?
If not now, when?