06-12-2013, 05:10 PM
Another DiEugenio review that dispenses the need to read the book being reviewed.
One thought however. Baker may have omitted the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter because he was instructed to. It could be that he entered it later on only because whoever may have been instructing him at the police station realized the cat was out of the bag with Truly or such. So, in other words, instead of being evidence the encounter was false it could be evidence it was true and being left out at first because it exonerated Oswald. Remember, Oswald was spotted at 12:25 by Carolyn Arnold. So it still stands to reason he was in the lunchroom. If he was on the front steps I think someone would have noticed him and spoken of it.
DiEugenio shows Shenon is just a lame rehash of Brian Latell designed to fool the unstudied.
One thought however. Baker may have omitted the 2nd floor lunchroom encounter because he was instructed to. It could be that he entered it later on only because whoever may have been instructing him at the police station realized the cat was out of the bag with Truly or such. So, in other words, instead of being evidence the encounter was false it could be evidence it was true and being left out at first because it exonerated Oswald. Remember, Oswald was spotted at 12:25 by Carolyn Arnold. So it still stands to reason he was in the lunchroom. If he was on the front steps I think someone would have noticed him and spoken of it.
DiEugenio shows Shenon is just a lame rehash of Brian Latell designed to fool the unstudied.