05-07-2009, 03:13 PM
Paul Rigby Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:http://www.blackopradio.com/black430c.ram
Take a listen....!
I did, and I'm still left with the same questions as when I read DiEugenio's essay:
Given that the Z film is a blatant fake, in what way is Groden less of a purveyor of disinformation than Mack? Is it that the latter's role at the Sixth Form Museum of Correction is, in and of itself, much more blameworthy? If so, why? And how would replacing Mack with, say, Groden, improve matters?
I'm beginning to suspect that what we are witnessing is nothing less than a campaign to effect the Obama-isation of the SFM and the Z fake: a new, more plausible face on a tawdry, if profoundly successful, establishment deception.
Paul why do you find it so necessary to keep changing the subject? If someone posted about the medical evidence, or Harvey and Lee, would just come back about the Z film? To lump Bob Groden in with Mack et al is absurd.
Jim has already offered to have this discussion privately with you, so why not take him up on it? Peter's question is a legitimate and important one. If you want to question the validity of the Zapruder film please start a thread doing so.
Thank you,
Dawn