15-09-2014, 06:42 PM
The proof is that the 6'3" of assassination footage in the archives is not seemlessly attached to ANYTHING which can be considered indicative of the original film...
How exactly can 33 feet of film become over 40 feet of film...with 7 splice marks, no 0183 imprinted, and none of the other Side B images... let alone the FACT the film was split to create one long 50+ foot film.
This is akin to a hammer where the head was replaced 4 times, the handle 5 times and yet cause it's still a hammer, how can we dare call it "original" ??
Same here... The EVIDENCE IS THE CONSPIRACY... and this is one of the prime examples
DJ
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6290&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6290&stc=1)
How exactly can 33 feet of film become over 40 feet of film...with 7 splice marks, no 0183 imprinted, and none of the other Side B images... let alone the FACT the film was split to create one long 50+ foot film.
This is akin to a hammer where the head was replaced 4 times, the handle 5 times and yet cause it's still a hammer, how can we dare call it "original" ??
Same here... The EVIDENCE IS THE CONSPIRACY... and this is one of the prime examples
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter