27-12-2014, 04:34 AM
I don't think the person who made this video realizes the sky being behind the towers in the still video means it was taken from a lower perspective. If you notice, he does a background analysis of the ground and horizon with the helicopter video but doesn't do that with the still video. If he had, his own logic would show that there being sky behind the tower in the still video shows its point of origin is lower than the helicopter shot. He's simply wrong about both videos showing the top of the roof. His graphic showing this is something he just added. He has very poor observation skills because simple logic tells you the reason the plane is highlighted by open sky in the still shot is because it was taken from much lower down. He creates a strawman to deal with this by saying "Debunkers say there is extra haze blocking the horizon in the still video." Rubbish. There's obviously no haze. You're looking at plane with obvious clear sky behind it. The only reason he creates that strawman is because he knows he can't account for it.