02-11-2009, 11:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2009, 11:18 PM by Charles Drago.)
Jack,
Yes I have -- from cover to cover.
Please don't misunderstand me: I have as little reason to doubt the validity of Wilson's work as I have to accept it.
None of us should demonstrate the tiniest objection to legitimately objective, rigorously scientific testing of his method in general and the application of his method to the JFK evidence in particular.
As for Wilson's story in its non-technical aspects: I apologize in advance if you accept what I'm about to write as an insult to your friend's memory, but all I have right now is his word that events transpired as he related them. And surely you'll agree that when it comes to the investigation of this case, the word of no man should satisfy us when other avenues of investigation are open.
And no, I am not advocating for rigged experiments of the Randi, FEMA, and NIST varieties, for example.
Let Oliver Stone and/or other monied third parties ante up and fund controlled, monitored experiments. Let the chips fall where they may.
In closing, let me ask -- if you know -- why no overt mention is made of Wilson's alleged visit to the "secret" archives as facilitated by Ted Kennedy. Or should I infer that the multi-staged forgeries Wilson claims to have examined -- photos not previously known to exist -- were made available on that visit?
Charles
Yes I have -- from cover to cover.
Please don't misunderstand me: I have as little reason to doubt the validity of Wilson's work as I have to accept it.
None of us should demonstrate the tiniest objection to legitimately objective, rigorously scientific testing of his method in general and the application of his method to the JFK evidence in particular.
As for Wilson's story in its non-technical aspects: I apologize in advance if you accept what I'm about to write as an insult to your friend's memory, but all I have right now is his word that events transpired as he related them. And surely you'll agree that when it comes to the investigation of this case, the word of no man should satisfy us when other avenues of investigation are open.
And no, I am not advocating for rigged experiments of the Randi, FEMA, and NIST varieties, for example.
Let Oliver Stone and/or other monied third parties ante up and fund controlled, monitored experiments. Let the chips fall where they may.
In closing, let me ask -- if you know -- why no overt mention is made of Wilson's alleged visit to the "secret" archives as facilitated by Ted Kennedy. Or should I infer that the multi-staged forgeries Wilson claims to have examined -- photos not previously known to exist -- were made available on that visit?
Charles