03-11-2009, 01:59 PM
Peter,
It is safe to say that we find ourselves in agreement on what to me are the two most important issues: validation of method and support of interpretations.
Anyone who attempts to dismiss/demonize Wilson's work absent rigorous, objective scientific testing/replication is by definition an agent of disinformation.
By the same token, anyone who, absent positive conclusions from said evaluations, chooses to champion the Wilson oeuvre is courting disaster.
Jack,
I honor your loyalty and respect your expertise. Don't you ever think otherwise!
All,
Why don't we move this discussion along to solicit ideas for evaluations of Wilson's work?
It is safe to say that we find ourselves in agreement on what to me are the two most important issues: validation of method and support of interpretations.
Anyone who attempts to dismiss/demonize Wilson's work absent rigorous, objective scientific testing/replication is by definition an agent of disinformation.
By the same token, anyone who, absent positive conclusions from said evaluations, chooses to champion the Wilson oeuvre is courting disaster.
Jack,
I honor your loyalty and respect your expertise. Don't you ever think otherwise!
All,
Why don't we move this discussion along to solicit ideas for evaluations of Wilson's work?