06-01-2011, 10:13 PM
Robert,you evince great energy in the manner of Claudius Ptolemy proponent of the 1400-year-old geocentric concept, whose ever-expanding cycles and epicycles sought to retain its primacy in the face of growing evidence for ellipses, our sun, and the starsoh my.
Jim, you have exploded the legal case against Oswald vis-a-vis Tippit on numerous occasions, and in many ways shown the broken chains of evidence, the corrupted eye witness testimony, the misrepresentations which have propped up the official propaganda.
Charles, you continually indicate the welder did not design the bridge, though each fulfills his function.
I submit the cassus coup was Kennedy-against-the-grain, the lone man in Tiananmen Square standing in front of the column of four tanks, the man the PRC says does not exist.
Each of us represents a facet of the ninety-plus per cent of the American populus who hold an individual J'accuse, a slender volume of deeply-held truth against the ten million words from the Castle on the Plaza.
James Douglass presented the maverick for peace soon marked out for assassination.
The motivation of Ruby I submit was acting on orders from his Chicago roots who'd exiled him for drug-dealing in 1947 with the clear understanding they owned him. His relaxation at the news of Oswald's death was not Jackie-related. And oh yes it is linked, as all of it, back to the real sponsors to be determined.
In the continuum of time we refer to as history the life of a single man has great value.
The life of Kennedy has value todayas it has created a great force resisting the truth of his death.
I submit this as a prime proof of causality excluding the 36th president's characterization as designer or creator of the project.
Bloody, to be sure, but only one man.
So much more could be said of what Greg alluded to with the Regime-Change-R-Us crew, and the sponsors' attempts to confuse indicated by Charles.
And, as with Hunt doing that Donald Sutherland pointing, it all points AWAY from the seat of maximum guilt.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]1645[/ATTACH]
Jim, you have exploded the legal case against Oswald vis-a-vis Tippit on numerous occasions, and in many ways shown the broken chains of evidence, the corrupted eye witness testimony, the misrepresentations which have propped up the official propaganda.
Charles, you continually indicate the welder did not design the bridge, though each fulfills his function.
I submit the cassus coup was Kennedy-against-the-grain, the lone man in Tiananmen Square standing in front of the column of four tanks, the man the PRC says does not exist.
Each of us represents a facet of the ninety-plus per cent of the American populus who hold an individual J'accuse, a slender volume of deeply-held truth against the ten million words from the Castle on the Plaza.
James Douglass presented the maverick for peace soon marked out for assassination.
The motivation of Ruby I submit was acting on orders from his Chicago roots who'd exiled him for drug-dealing in 1947 with the clear understanding they owned him. His relaxation at the news of Oswald's death was not Jackie-related. And oh yes it is linked, as all of it, back to the real sponsors to be determined.
In the continuum of time we refer to as history the life of a single man has great value.
The life of Kennedy has value todayas it has created a great force resisting the truth of his death.
I submit this as a prime proof of causality excluding the 36th president's characterization as designer or creator of the project.
Bloody, to be sure, but only one man.
So much more could be said of what Greg alluded to with the Regime-Change-R-Us crew, and the sponsors' attempts to confuse indicated by Charles.
And, as with Hunt doing that Donald Sutherland pointing, it all points AWAY from the seat of maximum guilt.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]1645[/ATTACH]