16-01-2011, 06:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-01-2011, 06:56 PM by Albert Doyle.)
The worst sin anyone attempting to establish mastermind status could commit is not pursuing further evidence. If someone is looking for evidence to suggest conspiracy or guilt the worst thing they could do is stop short when there's good reason to look further. This is the same sin the Warren Commission committed.
To suggest Johnson's blackmailing of Kennedy was the sole sign of guilt is to miss the bigger picture in my opinion. It wasn't Kennedy who was the primary target of the blackmailing, it was Johnson. If you step back and look at the bigger picture you can see an incriminating pattern emerging similar to the know modus operandi of those who were the real masterminds. In my opinion Kennedy was blackmailed in order to put Johnson in place because he was much more ultimately blackmail-able himself. When you see this pattern you see the pattern of those who operate from a much wider and more favorably positioned placement similar to entrenched agencies and powers existing inside and outside government. You are seeing the shadow of the "Unspeakable" becoming clear.
When you realize Johnson was induced into blackmailing Kennedy in order to put Johnson in the position of ultimate blackmail-ability you see a pattern emerge that starts to lead back to the real masterminds. This kind of thinking in advance indicates the sophistication and strategy of agencies and departments known to practice such as their normal routine. What you are looking at are chess moves. And when using a chessboard analogy Johnson was only a chess piece. Even with this simple example it's obvious that a single chess piece does not control the general board, its rules, or the overall 'game'. Johnson can rightly be looked at as the black 'King' who checkmated the white King, but was not the one "playing the game". This chess move was completed by a strategy involving blaming an ordinary pawn that left the opening by means of a bad move. However there were many pieces that failed to protect the King, including a white 'Queen' that worked for the black side. Such a corruption of the basic rules of the game could never be initiated or controlled by one single piece, simple as that, and any credible Assassination author would never dare violate this basic obvious fact.
Once you establish Johnson used Hoover's files to blackmail Kennedy you've established a link to those shadowy powers that must be pursued. Just look at who is allowed to obtain files and who isn't and why? Look at the files that were withheld and why and look at those that were brought forth and why and you'll begin to understand that this was far outside the control and direction of Johnson. It's basic science and nature that the bigger force doesn't control the smaller, weaker force and anyone who stops short in investigating this pattern has violated the basic natural processes that control all things. And I think it's ludicrous to imply CIA and those larger forces were the happy go lucky recipients of Johnson's evil ambitions when the overall pattern is so obviously clear. Johnson is just another patsy. Beware those who attempt to repeat the Warren Commission's sin of establishing another fall guy when any true investigation looks further.
To suggest Johnson's blackmailing of Kennedy was the sole sign of guilt is to miss the bigger picture in my opinion. It wasn't Kennedy who was the primary target of the blackmailing, it was Johnson. If you step back and look at the bigger picture you can see an incriminating pattern emerging similar to the know modus operandi of those who were the real masterminds. In my opinion Kennedy was blackmailed in order to put Johnson in place because he was much more ultimately blackmail-able himself. When you see this pattern you see the pattern of those who operate from a much wider and more favorably positioned placement similar to entrenched agencies and powers existing inside and outside government. You are seeing the shadow of the "Unspeakable" becoming clear.
When you realize Johnson was induced into blackmailing Kennedy in order to put Johnson in the position of ultimate blackmail-ability you see a pattern emerge that starts to lead back to the real masterminds. This kind of thinking in advance indicates the sophistication and strategy of agencies and departments known to practice such as their normal routine. What you are looking at are chess moves. And when using a chessboard analogy Johnson was only a chess piece. Even with this simple example it's obvious that a single chess piece does not control the general board, its rules, or the overall 'game'. Johnson can rightly be looked at as the black 'King' who checkmated the white King, but was not the one "playing the game". This chess move was completed by a strategy involving blaming an ordinary pawn that left the opening by means of a bad move. However there were many pieces that failed to protect the King, including a white 'Queen' that worked for the black side. Such a corruption of the basic rules of the game could never be initiated or controlled by one single piece, simple as that, and any credible Assassination author would never dare violate this basic obvious fact.
Once you establish Johnson used Hoover's files to blackmail Kennedy you've established a link to those shadowy powers that must be pursued. Just look at who is allowed to obtain files and who isn't and why? Look at the files that were withheld and why and look at those that were brought forth and why and you'll begin to understand that this was far outside the control and direction of Johnson. It's basic science and nature that the bigger force doesn't control the smaller, weaker force and anyone who stops short in investigating this pattern has violated the basic natural processes that control all things. And I think it's ludicrous to imply CIA and those larger forces were the happy go lucky recipients of Johnson's evil ambitions when the overall pattern is so obviously clear. Johnson is just another patsy. Beware those who attempt to repeat the Warren Commission's sin of establishing another fall guy when any true investigation looks further.