Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls.

[Phil Dragoo]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4470[/ATTACH]

[Charles Drago]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4470[/ATTACH]

Right up there with "I brake for snipers."

[Jim Hackett II]

there can be little question of Phil Dragoo's stunning talents.
Where I would consumes a half paragraph Phil whups the thing in few words and images; All quite succinct and excellent.
Favorites around here are:
Confusatory with Jerk Goebbels,
"I brake for Snipers"
And the JJAngleton in the ring of Fire.

Prose he writes is poetic and great too.

In Aeromodelling there are craftsmen like me. I fly R/C and that requires craftsmanship because I scratch build and design Sailplanes.

There are 'the others' that are artists. They fly free-flight. As in the 1930s, the air never changes only the 'planes and the people.

Regards to members
Jim

[Dawn Meredith]

CD :WAKE UP! Jim Fetzer isn't "merely" anything in the research community. He is a prominent figure whose highly visible descent into madness, whether precipitated by physical and/or mental decline, a sinister agenda, or all of these factors, provides immense aid and comfort to the enemy.

This is one explanation.

Does anyone agree with this as an explanation?

I do. We spend a lot of time here privately discussing JF before the untimate decision to ban him. It was based on the view that whatever the cause, he had become mad. Dementia? MKULTRA? We have no way of knowing just WHAT happened to this very damaged soul but he had become an embarrassment.

I also thought we agreed to leave him in peace and stop discussing him here where he cannot defend himself. I note that EF has reached the same conclusion, and now he is banned there. Charles Drago said it first. With a heavy heart.
Dawn

[Jim DiEugenio]

Dawn:

I did not know about his banishment from EF.

Wow. You've really got to be off the reservation to get banned from there.

What to make of all this?

He still has his show, and Veteran's Today.

[Dawn Meredith]

I have not been "debating" LNers at the EF or anywhere else. I don't do that. Unless I can feel confident they are a newbie and therefore simply misguided, in which case I'm happy to discuss anything with them. However, I don't attack them either. The evidence speaks for itself, as you well know.

Don Jeffries is a stalwart advocate of the prima facie case for conspiracy.

The truth is not to be defended but observed -- the holes in JFK's clothes are too low to have been associated with the throat wound.

I can't count the times Don had my back over at the EF.

I agree with this . Don is fair, intelligent, well read on this subject and is deserving of an apology.

I apologise on behalf of DPF.

Dawn

ps I have been on vacation out of the country since 3/7- 3/18 and insanely busy with work since my return so am only catching up here now on this (otherwise) working weekend.

[Jim Hackett II]

Agreed on all points Dawn.
Still with a heavy heart to have had to watch this series of events. Not just DPF but all the path.

[Don Jeffries]

Thanks for the support, Dawn. I appreciate it.

[Albert Doyle]

I appreciate Don's defense of myself but have to add that I disagree with his defense of Fetzer over on EF. I personally feel the Doorway Man issue has been resolved within reason and Doorway Man is provably Lovelady and any defense of Fetzer on grounds of objectivity is quixotic sophistry.

[John Mooney]

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/cgi-sy...wforum=126

"[B]This Account Has Been Suspended[/B]"

Anyone else?????