Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof of Concept- Z Film Alteration
#11
David Josephs Wrote:So you can lead it wherever you 'd like, no?

And yes, I would LOVE to hear how the film in the Archives - all 6'3" of it - could have been originally filmed at 18.3 and exhibit the movement anomolies we see...

You do remember making a film for me at 48fps and cutting it down to 16fps (remove 2/3) and shown at 15fps...

It illustrates what we see in the extant Zfilm... and hides 2/3's of the activity... by cutting out 4 frames in a row one can remove quite a lot and still keep the 1st and last frames for continuity...
The film would appear to jump very slightly...

Do we see any slight jumps in the Z-film? of course we do. Especially during the headshot sequence...

DJ

Why don't you direct me to another topic and ask me about it there.

I explained that this topic will be short and sweet.

Put your frame rate questions on hold for a second and tell me you understand the 2 gifs I have provided.

chris
Reply
#12
Compare my video to Zframes 280-281.

The bottom edge/part of the background structure in Z appears as a ghost image one frame before it hits the top sprocket hole.

They agree.

chris


Attached Files
.gif   280-281.gif (Size: 258.55 KB / Downloads: 10)
Reply
#13
If you understand the comparison between my film and Z280-281, you should have no problems figuring out what is wrong (Zfilm wise) with this last and final gif.

The film is running at approx 18fps within the photo. Remember, keep the panning speed of my gif (also approx 18fps) in mind when comparing

This is all about GHOST IMAGES, nothing else.

It helps to know what the background structure looked like when added to the extant Zfilm.

chris


Attached Files
.gif   280-308AAA.gif (Size: 7.35 MB / Downloads: 11)
Reply
#14
Chris Davidson Wrote:
Chris Davidson Wrote:Step one:

I shot this footage back in 2005 from the pedestal with a B/H 414 on full zoom.

Stabilized it.

Important Aspects: 1. The ghost image over the lower sprocket hole
2. Panning Speed


chris


Observe the relationship of the building edge at the top of the main frame leading into the upper sprocket hole tothe building edge from the ghost image (over the lower sprocket hole).The building edge at the top of the main frame leading into the upper sprocket hole trails the building edge from the ghost image (over the lower sprocket hole) by 1 frame.

This is the only concept you need to understand.

chris


Always enjoy how cryptic you remain Chris... You say things without actually saying them...

Yes, the ghost image is actually the extended TOP of the previous frame..
Which is why the film MUST have been refilmed onto the extant film at some point, otherwise these images would not match...

The instantaneous cut from one frame to the next, when Z supposedly stopped filming, would be exposed if it had not been refilmed.

If this had been a straight stop and start. From z132 (last frame before limo-blurry) the ghost image on 133 SHOULD be identical to the image under the top sprocket hole in 132 since it was already exposed as a ghost when 132 was filmed. The spill-over at the top left of 133 under the sprocket, if from a previous frame, should NOT show vehicles making the turn.

This spliced transition, along with the corroborating testimony proves that Zapruder did not stop filming once the motorcade arrived and DID film the wide turn as discussed by Truly.
I believe the 48fps filming started with this transition and is why this portion of the film was not "refilmed" to correct the ghost image problem)




[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6298&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   Zframes 131-134.jpg (Size: 248.19 KB / Downloads: 34)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#15
Chris Davidson Wrote:If you understand the comparison between my film and Z280-281, you should have no problems figuring out what is wrong (Zfilm wise) with this last and final gif.

The film is running at approx 18fps within the photo. Remember, keep the panning speed of my gif (also approx 18fps) in mind when comparing

This is all about GHOST IMAGES, nothing else.

It helps to know what the background structure looked like when added to the extant Zfilm.

chris

Since you "have no problems figuring out what is wrong" - can you state it simply?

Between you and Purvis all we seem to get are suggestions rather than analytical conclusions...

The ghost images is the width of the sprocket holes, NOT the darker vs lighter areas.. The sprocket hole ghosts areas remain lighter than the other areas...

What EXACTLY are you saying?
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#16
David,

The structure in the background (280-307) has openings which are quite noticeable. It is a continuous structure.

The ghost images we see during this span are delayed at least/approx 10 frames from when they should appear.

chris
Reply
#17
The numbers in the ghost image area would correspond to the structure opening numbers if the film was correct.

Use the right side of the Zfilm upper sprocket hole as your guide.

chris


Attached Files
.gif   Columns-33.3%-AAAAA.5SEC.gif (Size: 2.4 MB / Downloads: 7)
Reply
#18
Ok, I get you...

Aren't these columns and the rest of that part of that structure curving away from the camera position.

As the object is farther away the distance increases under the same panning motions...

Could it not simply be the change in distance and being unaware of the rate of panning?

DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#19
Start at ghost image frame 296 and count the number of openings moving to your right. I count 5.

The last one runs into Jean Hill. Those last three openings as ghost images are approx the same width.

You can't get that size ghost image opening from the last 2-3 openings (right to left 7,8,9) because of the camera angle. #9 is pretty much closed.

Also, on the back side of this structure, at an angle to the Z pedestal, looking through #6 opening, there is a solid white pedestal that rises above the #6 opening.

This does not appear in any ghost image among those openings.

chris

P.S. I believe that is the pedestal Bell was filming from.


Attached Files
.jpg   Columns Platform.jpg (Size: 553.64 KB / Downloads: 6)
.jpg   Columns Platform 2.jpg (Size: 160.98 KB / Downloads: 6)
.jpg   Bell Filming.jpg (Size: 13.02 KB / Downloads: 5)
Reply
#20
Chris: I'd like to ask you a huge favor. Could you please post or send me every third frame of your short film (since you filmed at 48 fps)? I'd like to compare your film with my pixel counting work on the Z film and see if I find the same anomalies as I found there.

If I find the same anomalies, its more likely my methodology or some intrinsic camera error. If I don't find the same anomalies, its more likely the Z film was altered. Thanking you in advance for your assistance!
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DARNELL film Original Richard Gilbride 8 477 23-11-2024, 07:34 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Final Proof Prayer Man Is Sarah Stanton Brian Doyle 3 568 13-06-2024, 07:04 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) in Dan Owens film Richard Gilbride 7 2,209 01-10-2023, 03:25 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Proof the CE 139 Rifle did not kill JFK Gil Jesus 0 722 28-11-2022, 11:30 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Manipulation of TOWNER film David Josephs 0 2,320 26-11-2019, 06:48 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  A simply proof the BYP are not real David Josephs 28 17,485 16-02-2018, 04:51 PM
Last Post: Ray Mitcham
  More proof Oswald not at the Cuban Embassy - LITAMIL-9 David Josephs 25 19,137 31-01-2018, 10:04 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Did Dillard film American-born LEE Oswald on sixth floor? Jim Hargrove 9 9,590 12-04-2017, 05:02 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  New JFK Film Peter Lemkin 4 6,008 12-11-2016, 06:16 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  How much could you alter the film if Abraham Zapruder had shot in slow motion mode? Chris Bennett 27 14,619 23-02-2016, 05:46 PM
Last Post: Chris Davidson

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)