Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oswald's tax records
#1
When Jim Garrison tried to get Oswald's tax returns, they were classified.

Anyone know if they have been released, perhaps under the ARRB? If not, maybe a good FOIA target?
Reply
#2
On November 22, 1996, Marina Oswald Porter and the Assassination Record Review Board's John Tunnheim appeared on the Oprah Winfrey television program. On that broadcast, Tunnheim asked Marina point blank to release Oswalds tax forms and said, "We're asking her to cooperate as well with help getting access to Lee Harvey Oswald's tax files...." Marina refused, adding: "It's not important." (from H&L website)

http://harveyandlee.net/Unraveling/Unravels.htm
Reply
#3
Martin White Wrote:When Jim Garrison tried to get Oswald's tax returns, they were classified.

Anyone know if they have been released, perhaps under the ARRB? If not, maybe a good FOIA target?

As noted above, never released.
Good 'target' - yes; possible successful target - not in your wildest dreams.
Its been tried, and if they weren't released under the JFK Records Act, they won't ever be.
They can NOT release them...they'd show he was on various intelligence agency payrolls.
You'll NEVER see them! The system protects itself - at all costs - and truth or the law be damned.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#4
Jim Hargrove Wrote:On November 22, 1996, Marina Oswald Porter and the Assassination Record Review Board's John Tunnheim appeared on the Oprah Winfrey television program. On that broadcast, Tunnheim asked Marina point blank to release Oswalds tax forms and said, "We're asking her to cooperate as well with help getting access to Lee Harvey Oswald's tax files...." Marina refused, adding: "It's not important." (from H&L website)

http://harveyandlee.net/Unraveling/Unravels.htm

Then we must surely question Marina's sincerity.
Reply
#5
Mark Lane has successfully argued in court that if Oswald was a lone nut, then where is the National Security argument?

I presume from Marina's comments that she has the tax records in her possession?
Reply
#6
Reply
#7
Reply
#8
Texas has no state income tax. But Louisiana does (I think). Maybe there are some old tax-type forms with the State of Louisiana.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
#9
Drew Phipps Wrote:Texas has no state income tax. But Louisiana does (I think). Maybe there are some old tax-type forms with the State of Louisiana.

Absolutely! The WC or the HSCA or the ARRB could have easily contacted the Louisiana Dept. of Revenue for Oswald's state income tax withholding records as well as the Board of Labor in New Orleans, which issued work permits for persons under the age of 18.

They didn't, though. With all those lawyers, apparently no one knew how to make a phone call to Louisiana.

This is clearly a pattern in government investigations. The Warren Commission went to the trouble of gathering together Marina and several other witnesses to try to establish whether Oswald drove a car. But not one of those brilliant attorneys bothered to call the Texas Department of Public Safety License Records Department to see if a driver's license had been issued to "Lee Harvey Oswald."

Our tax dollars at work!
Reply
#10
Another possible explanation for these discrepancies is that Angleton was creating a false trail of Oswald employment records in his mole hunt. He would have to plant several different incorrect nuggets for the mole to uncover, and the pattern of which nuggets were wrong and which were right would lead him to the mole.

Let's say I have 2 "secret files" and 4 possible suspects. 1 secret file contains misinformation. I let 2 of the suspects gain access to 1 "FBI secret file", and the other 2 gain access to a "CIA secret file". Then, I write 2 "top secret reports," one of which contains misinformation. Then, I pair off my suspects with a different suspect, and allow all of them access to one "secret report" or the other.

My four suspects will then each have access to a unique pattern of biographical information as follows:

s1 file correct, report correct

s2 file correct, report incorrect

s3 file incorrect, report correct

s4 file incorrect, report incorrect

I wait for the information to leak, and then I know the identity of my mole. The more pairs of misinformation I have, the more suspects can be identified from my original pool of suspects.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 182 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 463 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 516 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 545 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 591 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 590 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 718 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 864 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 643 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Oswald and the Shot at Walker Jim DiEugenio 1 796 24-03-2023, 04:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)