Posts: 16,111
Threads: 1,773
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Couldn't it just have been photographed before she turned in any parts to anyone? [An unusual thing to do, I agree - but not impossible.] The offset of the page below is due to the top page being detached and offset. At least two pages are there - but seems to me I remember this form and one sent one to state, one to federal, kept one and there was maybe one other. Each one said what it was for. I don't remember the order.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Yeah, we're still well within the ballpark of CIA screwing-up big time and having one of their specialists forge this without consulting the template.
Huge blow-up in their faces if this is true! Similar to the rifle screw-up.
Posts: 2,131
Threads: 199
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Any employer would have a blank one, so JVB could have gotten one (even if not from Reilly) and typed Reily's name and tax ID number on it.
Form C is for the employees personal record. Form A is for the employer, maybe?
The top form in the image doesn't go with the line of holes to the far right. There is too much paper between the edge and the hole of the far right line of holes for the top part to come from the rest of that book. This photograph is a unused copy B on top of something else that looks (judging by the bleed thru) more like a real W2.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 81
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2012
Dawn Meredith Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:Above, I showed that the bleed thru from underneath appears as if there is another copy of this Baker W-2...
And then it dawned on me that the sheet on top was moved UP and over - so I realigned the holes on the right, where this sheet should have been before it was torn off
(and btw - why is there an entire book under this page... her Copy B W-2 would have a stamp in it from being attached to her return and as Drew pointed out... she would not have this copy..)
in any case, when you move the holes to the right spot the blled thru no longer works...
Is it possible that is simply a Reily stamped book of blank W-2's and this like so many other records for secret CIA work - this document was created, erased, recreateed, typed over, etc...??
The red arrows point to where we SHOULD see bleed thru - the white where the bleed thru or "whatever" actual is....
Any ideas?
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6655&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6655&stc=1)
Wow, very interesting. I don't thank any of us have considered that before, David. If she did have a blank then how would she have acquired it?
I don't think SHE had the blanks, the Reily/CIA front had them and like her days at college and the creation of records to cover her work there... the same was done here...
I don't think she ever officially worked for "Reily" as much as doing the work the Reily front was protecting.
This W-2 is simply not what was used nor does it match this book it rests upon...
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
It could be that CIA had special W-2 forms made up for CIA front companies as a visual identifier of CIA employers and employees.
If you think about it this might be proof of sorts JVB's involvement with intel.
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 81
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2012
Albert Doyle Wrote:It could be that CIA had special W-2 forms made up for CIA front companies as a visual identifier of CIA employers and employees.
If you think about it this might be proof of sorts JVB's involvement with intel.
That may be a bit over the top - yet who knows...
To date I have yet to see a copy of a 1963 W-2 (or any 1960's W-2) that looks like that...
Peter - I've linked repeated in this thread to the IRS forms for that year... Copy A is for the District Director http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/fw2--1963.pdf
There really is no reason for JVB to have the IRS copy B of this form in her possession unless this is before she filed it and took a photo of it to prove ??? when she'd have Copy C for her records...
Is there anyone here who has read her book that can say whether she address this or not?
Same thing with the apartment address in NOLA... Does she literally neglect to name the address along this route where she moved - when this was the happiest time of her life, being able to ride to and from work with your lover??
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6656&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6656&stc=1)
The one piece of physical evidence is now shown to be BS, and her witness testimony consists of the wife of an associate of Bannister's ??
http://doctormarysmonkey.com/jvb/pages/W...erview.htm[TABLE="width: 863"]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 5"] In early January 2000, Debra Conway (owner and co-founder of JFK Lancer) volunteered to video-tape Anna Lewis in New Orleans. In the videotape, Anna said that she and her husband David Lewis had socialized frequently with Judy Baker and Lee Oswald in New Orleans in the Summer of 1963, including a visit to The Five Hundred Club, where they met with Carlos Marcello. Anna stressed that she thought Judy and Lee were lovers at that time. Anna's filmed testimony was witnessed by Anna's daughter Sondra, Dr. Joseph Riehl, Dr. Howard Platzman, historian Martin Shackelford, Judyth Baker, and Debra Conway who asked Anna questions as she filmed her.
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 5"]The photo shown about was taken immediately following the Anna Lewis interview.
[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 5"]Has Debra Conway forgotten that she interviewed Anna Lewis?
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyN37x3OfHs I could not find the Conway interview yet here is the Wim interview.
At 1:45 - "In about Feb 1962, I met Lee Harvey Oswald in the Park" (by Bannister's place where she went for a date with he husband to be David Lewis, a friend of Jack Martin who was pistol whipped by Bannister.
The park as you can see from the map above, was Lafayette park.
In Feb 1962 Ozzie was in Minsk. She goes on to say she and David leave NOLA in April 1962...
Problem is that even if she meant 1963... in Feb, March and April 1963 Ozzie is in Texas.
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963.
This woman is completely lost... Jack Martin and David were NOT working for Bannister when they moved back to New Orleans sometime later in 1962.
She then tells stories of Lee in NOLA in 1962...
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963. and NEVER lives in New Orleans in 1962...
and yet another card holding up this house goes flying away
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
05-02-2015, 04:42 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2015, 06:29 AM by Albert Doyle.)
David Josephs Wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyN37x3OfHs I could not find the Conway interview yet here is the Wim interview.
At 1:45 - "In about Feb 1962, I met Lee Harvey Oswald in the Park" (by Bannister's place where she went for a date with he husband to be David Lewis, a friend of Jack Martin who was pistol whipped by Bannister.
The park as you can see from the map above, was Lafayette park.
In Feb 1962 Ozzie was in Minsk. She goes on to say she and David leave NOLA in April 1962...
Problem is that even if she meant 1963... in Feb, March and April 1963 Ozzie is in Texas.
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963.
This woman is completely lost... Jack Martin and David were NOT working for Bannister when they moved back to New Orleans sometime later in 1962.
She then tells stories of Lee in NOLA in 1962...
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963. and NEVER lives in New Orleans in 1962...
and yet another card holding up this house goes flying away
DJ
She says she met David Lewis in 1961 when he was working with Banister. She then says she met Oswald in February 1962, adding that Lewis no longer worked for Banister at that time.
To me this scenario is entirely plausible considering the Oswald doubles.
The better statement is at 19:00 where she repeats she met Oswald after January and before April 1962.
.
Posts: 16,111
Threads: 1,773
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
05-02-2015, 12:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2015, 12:32 PM by Peter Lemkin.)
What I was trying to suggest is when sent to her in 1964, it was photographed then, before filing and sending pages to various places. Just exploring all the possibilities. As I remember, they came in the mail with all the pages - with the employer keeping one before sending.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 81
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2012
Albert Doyle Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyN37x3OfHs I could not find the Conway interview yet here is the Wim interview.
At 1:45 - "In about Feb 1962, I met Lee Harvey Oswald in the Park" (by Bannister's place where she went for a date with he husband to be David Lewis, a friend of Jack Martin who was pistol whipped by Bannister.
The park as you can see from the map above, was Lafayette park.
In Feb 1962 Ozzie was in Minsk. She goes on to say she and David leave NOLA in April 1962...
Problem is that even if she meant 1963... in Feb, March and April 1963 Ozzie is in Texas.
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963.
This woman is completely lost... Jack Martin and David were NOT working for Bannister when they moved back to New Orleans sometime later in 1962.
She then tells stories of Lee in NOLA in 1962...
He does not get to New Orleans until the end of April 1963. and NEVER lives in New Orleans in 1962...
and yet another card holding up this house goes flying away
DJ
She says she met David Lewis in 1961 when he was working with Banister. She then says she met Oswald in February 1962, adding that Lewis no longer worked for Banister at that time.
To me this scenario is entirely plausible considering the Oswald doubles.
The better statement is at 19:00 where she repeats she met Oswald after January and before April 1962.
.
She doesn't ever claim to be with the original LEE but only with this Harvey fella - unless her job here is to confuse the issue -
The dates just don't work - regardless of 62 or 63... How can anyone accept her story when the two main pieces of evidence are both proven to be in conflict with reality??
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
David Josephs Wrote:The dates just don't work - regardless of 62 or 63... How can anyone accept her story when the two main pieces of evidence are both proven to be in conflict with reality??
I don't understand. Are you saying Lee could not be in New Orleans in March or April 1962? Anna Lewis appears to be telling the truth. She strikes me as being too dumb to lie that effectively.
|
