Hillary sick?

[Dawn Meredith]

Anyway one slices it, this is one WEIRD Presidential election.......and seems it will only get weirder. The face to face debates will be, I think, startling - and there are certainly many more strange twists and turns in this and other as yet unknown angles. Fasten your seatbelt! ::

One of those twists being the Washington Post effectively backing the conspiracy theory cum utter rubbish that it's the Russians and Trump who poisoned Hilary.

The undead that now inhabits US journalism just plunged another wooden stake through its own heart - just to be sure.

Yes I am seeing this garbage and am wondering if these people are disinfo agents or simply deluded. And there are a ton of people who believe she is dead.

[Paul Rigby]

Anyway one slices it, this is one WEIRD Presidential election.......and seems it will only get weirder. The face to face debates will be, I think, startling - and there are certainly many more strange twists and turns in this and other as yet unknown angles. Fasten your seatbelt! ::

One of those twists being the Washington Post effectively backing the conspiracy theory cum utter rubbish that it's the Russians and Trump who poisoned Hilary.

The undead that now inhabits US journalism just plunged another wooden stake through its own heart - just to be sure.

Yes I am seeing this garbage and am wondering if these people are disinfo agents or simply deluded. And there are a ton of people who believe she is dead.

Putin Possibly Injecting Journalists' With Substance That Compels Them to Write Utter Drivel Expert Says

If he can poison Hillary Clinton what else can he do?

By Rob Slane, 15 September 2016

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/br...ter-drivel

Experts believe that Russian President, Vladimir Putin, has possibly discovered a substance which, when injected into journalists, causes them to write utter drivel. Suspicions have been growing for some time that Mr Putin has been developing such a chemical, but what once might have been consigned to the realm of conspiracy theories can, according to the experts, no longer be dismissed.

Confirmation that the theory might be true gained credibility after several media outlets published pieces alleging that Mr Putin has managed to poison Democratic Party nominee, Hillary Clinton. The London Metro, for instance, ran a piece entitled, "Trump and Putin poisoned Hillary Clinton, warns top doctor" whilst the Washington Post ran with the headline "The man who discovered CTE thinks Hillary Clinton may have been poisoned," before going on to implicate both Mr Trump and Mr Putin.

According to one expert we talked to there are several tell-tale signs that readers should look out for in news pieces for signs that Putin might be behind them:

"One thing to look out for is the use of experts' to add credibility to the piece, without ever telling us who they are or why we should believe them. Another sign is the existence of words and phrases like possibly', probably', might have', and maybe'. This shows that the journalist really doesn't know what they are talking about, has no hard facts to back up what they're saying, but mysteriously they appear compelled to say it anyway. That such journalism has been on the rise recently is not really in dispute, but the question is who is behind it?"

According to the expert, there is probably only one candidate:

"The evidence points to Mr Putin who, as is well known, possibly has a desire to subvert mainstream journalism, and probably has the means to do it. He also might have a motive and therefore maybe responsible for a good many cases of bad journalism."

However, critics of the theory point to a major flaw. If Putin were really the driving force behind crazy journalism in the mainstream media, would we really be seeing a mountain of negative articles written about him, such as the claim that he might be behind the possible poisoning of Mrs Clinton? The answer, according to the expert, could be much more sinister than you might think:

"Developing a substance that compels journalists to write stuff that makes them look like fools, but also forces them to write glowing pieces about ourselves is the kind of thing you and I normal people that is would do, if we happened to be evil dictators that wanted to rule the world. But real evil dictators that want to rule the world probably don't think like that. They might be far more cunning. They're all about obscuring reality and sowing confusion. And what better way to confuse people and send them off the track that he himself is behind bad journalism than for Mr Putin to have journalists write utter drivel about him poisoning Mrs Clinton. Nobody except experts like me of course would ever suspect him of being behind pieces like that, would they?"

Then again, the explanation might be a bit more mundane:

"Of course it could be that he has so far only managed to develop a substance that can make journalists write drivel, but hasn't refined it enough so as to make them write drivel about some things, whilst always saying nice things about him."

If the theory is true, it raises a couple of questions that for some will be extremely unnerving. How long has this been going on? And if it has been going on for a long time, could it be that some of the stuff journalists have written before the (possible) poisoning of Mrs Clinton, were also crazy?

For instance, what if the thousands of stories about Russia invading Ukraine every Tuesday for the last two-and-a-half years have been drivel? The absence of satellite images, plus the fact that if they have invaded they don't seem to have got very far might indicate that Putin was possibly behind them. What if all those stories about the imminent invasion of the Baltics and Poland have been drivel? The absence of any reason at all why Russia might want to do such a thing could again point to the possible involvement of Putin. And what if all those stories about Crimeans suffering under Putin's regime were all drivel? The absence of bloodshed and protests before, during and since the referendum could once again point to the possibility that the journalists who wrote them had been compelled by Putin to write spurious nonsense.

And what of all the stories about Donald Trump being an agent of Putin? Or of Putin hacking the DNC server? Could it be that these stories too were written as a result of Putin's desire to make journalists write garbage? According to the expert, this is a distinct possibility:

"The past couple of years has seen a plethora of stories about Mr Putin being the new Hitler, hacking and invading here there and everywhere, and generally being Dr. Evil. I had assumed them all to be true. But if it was Putin who was actually behind all those stories, poisoning the minds of the journalists that wrote them, then the truth is even scarier. And if he can possibly do it to journalists, just as he possibly, maybe, could have, might have poisoned Alexander Litvinenko and possibly, maybe, could have, might have poisoned Hillary Clinton, then I'm afraid that possibly none of us is safe."

Any journalists that think they might have been poisoned by Vladimir Putin and forced to write drivel should immediately seek medical help. As far as we know, Mr Putin hasn't yet managed to poison the minds of the entire medical profession, but there are rumours that he possibly might be about to.

[R.K. Locke]

Anyway one slices it, this is one WEIRD Presidential election.......and seems it will only get weirder. The face to face debates will be, I think, startling - and there are certainly many more strange twists and turns in this and other as yet unknown angles. Fasten your seatbelt! ::

One of those twists being the Washington Post effectively backing the conspiracy theory cum utter rubbish that it's the Russians and Trump who poisoned Hilary.

The undead that now inhabits US journalism just plunged another wooden stake through its own heart - just to be sure.

Yes I am seeing this garbage and am wondering if these people are disinfo agents or simply deluded. And there are a ton of people who believe she is dead.

[Paul Rigby]

Conspiracy theories multiply as the time available to refute them passes unused

The section beginning at 11:13 is very compelling:

[video=youtube_share;Zr1IDQ2V1eM]http://youtu.be/Zr1IDQ2V1eM[/video]

Hillary Clinton's Parkinsons - How to Prove Me Wrong

Published on Sep 9, 2016

[video=youtube_share;OezFQluUVS0]http://youtu.be/OezFQluUVS0[/video]

Hillary Clinton - Ground Zero Analysis

Published on Sep 12, 2016

[video=youtube_share;q5mYx5oCxEg]http://youtu.be/q5mYx5oCxEg[/video]

[David Guyatt]

I just checked the symptoms and remedies of Parkinson's (freezing, wearing blue glasses etc) and the good doctor seems to have a possible case.

[David Guyatt]

[COLOR=inherit !important][FONT=inherit !important]A Brain-damaged US President with Finger on the Nuclear Button?[COLOR=inherit !important][FONT=inherit !important][/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=inherit !important][FONT=inherit !important][/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=inherit !important][FONT=inherit !important]By F. William engdahl[COLOR=#5EABDF !important]2[/COLOR][/FONT][/COLOR]
24 Aug 2016[/FONT][/COLOR]
Hillary Rodham Clinton seems to surround herself with more scandals than you can shake a stick at, as we said when I was growing up in Texas. We had the Mena, Arkansas scandals when her husband, Bubba, otherwise known as William Jefferson Clinton, was Attorney General and then Governor. Ambrose Evans Pritchard, the British Telegraph investigative journalist did a masterful documentation of that in his The Secret Life of Bill Clinton, when Bill was President facing impeachment in the 1990's. Then there are the Clinton Foundation scandals documented in the 2015 Peter Schweitzer book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, detailing how Hillary abused her office as Secretary of State to steer huge Saudi and other "donations" to the Clinton Foundation on whose board she sat as soon as leaving office as Secretary of State. There are of course the national security e-mail server scandals which a corrupted Attorney General and a corrupt FBI director swept under the rug. This latest scandal puts all others in the background. It's her refusal to release all medical records detailing her medications and true state of health following a brain concussion in 2012. The Democratic candidate is likely medically suffering from irreversible dementia.
On August 8, a New Jersey radio host and blogger released what he claimed were leaked copies of Hillary Clinton's 2014 medical records from her doctor, Lisa Bardack M.D. of the Mt. Kisco Medical Group in upstate New York. According to the documents, Dr. Bardack wrote that Clinton had "early-onset Subcortical Vascular Dementia" following a serious brain concussion she suffered from a fall when she was Secretary of State, on December 7, 2012. After that fall, she spent six months in constant hospital care according to Bill Clinton, who told ABC News in 2014 that her injury "required six months of very serious work to get over." On February 1, 2013 Secretary of State and future Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, abruptly resigned as Secretary of State with no link to her health mentioned.
ABCNews in May, 2014 cited the following quote from her doctors, one of whom was Dr. Lisa Bardack: "In the course of a routine follow-up MRI on Sunday, the scan revealed…a clot in the vein that is situated in the space between the brain and the skull behind the right ear. It did not result in a stroke, or neurological damage. To help dissolve this clot, her medical team began treating the Secretary with blood thinners…" Dr. Lisa Bardack, Mt. Kisco Medical Group, and Dr. Gigi El-Bayoumi, George Washington University. George Washington University.
According to the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, Subcortical Vascular Dementia "is a progressive disease; there is no cure." Symptoms include forgetfulness, changes in speech, an unsteady gait, clumsiness or frequent falls, changes in personality or mood. Candidate Clinton has been filmed by the media in recent weeks frequently stumbling and falling for no apparent reason. She often appears on the podium with a man whose function appears to be there in case she loses balance. The copy of Dr. Bardack's 5 February 2014 follow-up examination, if genuine, states that Mrs. Clinton reported to her that the "blacking out, uncontrollable twitching and memory loss have become worse…The patient scored significantly lower on today's test than when tested in 2013…The patient is also showing signs of having more frequent complex seizures."
The Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, an internationally renowned center for research on Altzheimers and other brain illnesses, defines "Subcortical Vascular Dementia" as follows: Subcortical vascular dementia, also called Binswanger's disease, is caused by widespread, microscopic areas of damage to the brain resulting from the thickening and narrowing (atherosclerosis) of arteries that supply blood to the subcortical areas of the brain.
Now on August 17, the Clinton campaign headquarters released a statement purporting to be from Dr. Bardack and provided to FactCheck.org. In the statement Dr Bardack is quoted stating that the leaked health documents were not authentic, declaring they were "false, were not written by me and are not based on any medical facts."
Given the highest issues of the true health situation of a candidate quite possibly becoming the next US President, however, it is not satisfactory that the statement is released by Clinton's campaign to FactCheck.org and is not made directly by Dr. Bardack herself to lay rumors to rest. She herself refuses to reply to press queries. So the quoted denial is not at all sufficient, given the very high stakes for the nation and world. Whatever the truth of the alleged leaked medical report of Dr. Bardack, it is a matter of undeniable record that Clinton has repeatedly been filmed during the campaign stumbling and falling. Poor balance is typically associated with strokes or head injuries. Did she suffer a stroke in December, 2012 that caused her to fall and suffer a concussion, or did the brain concussion cause the stroke? Are her frequent severe coughing attacks a result of anti-seizure medication? If so, which?
Relevant also is a report run in the online site, Infowars, by Paul Joseph Watson, reporting on information provided to his associate at the recent Republican National Convention in Cleveland by a Secret Service "whistleblower," who reportedly stated, based on direct observation of other Secret Service agents detailed to the Clinton campaign that:

" Hillary has a very serious neurological degeneration which could be Parkinson's disease; Around half a million dollars has been spent to specially adapt three SUVs in which Hillary travels to provide lowered floors and disabled access to prevent Hillary from tripping. Hillary's staff is so intent on keeping reporters away from Clinton because she is at risk of petit mal seizures that can be triggered by camera flashes; Hillary has major problems with balance, difficulties with walking and keeps falling down; Hillary's campaign will be forced into making a big announcement soon regarding her medical condition."

That was reported at the Infowars website on 15 August. Two days later, not Dr. Bardack but the Clinton Campaign via FactCheck.org releases a purported denial of the authenticity of the leaked health documents. Was this the major announcement expected? If so, it appears a poor job.
What then do the true records of Dr Bardack reveal? What do the medical records of Hillary Rodham Clinton when she underwent the six months of very intensive treatment reportedly in New York City's Columbia University Medical Center reveal about her condition? What, if any, medication is she on today? Is she on blood-thinners? If so, which and what doses so that competent medical experts can comment on the risks. Anti-depressant drugs? Aspirin?
A candidate for public office, especially the highest office in the nation is no longer an ordinary private person. They have a responsibility to be open about their true medical condition. So far, Hillary Clinton has refused. Not only is it irresponsible, it is alarming, truly scary. The mainstream liberal USA media is not touching the issues in any serious way. We have a right to access to a complete and unbiased analysis of her health and medical treatment. She is a candidate for US President, the one with the finger on the nuclear button. She is not running for City Council of Mt. Kisco or president of the local Parent-Teachers' Association. If her own husband states to the media in 2014 that she had "a terrible concussion that required six months of very serious work to get over," this is no minor event.

Source

[Paul Rigby]

Anyway one slices it, this is one WEIRD Presidential election.......and seems it will only get weirder. The face to face debates will be, I think, startling - and there are certainly many more strange twists and turns in this and other as yet unknown angles. Fasten your seatbelt! ::

One of those twists being the Washington Post effectively backing the conspiracy theory cum utter rubbish that it's the Russians and Trump who poisoned Hilary.

The undead that now inhabits US journalism just plunged another wooden stake through its own heart - just to be sure.

I think the work of the establishment media in pushing this Russian nonsense so strongly suggests something much worse is afoot. By which I mean plan B is to false flag the robot, and slip Biden into the race.

Such a sequence would scratch any number of itches at once, from averting what now appears a certain Trump victory, to the Ukraine and beyond (most obviously Syria).

CIA Sets Up Clinton for 'Russian Hit'

Finian Cunningham

16 September 2016

https://sputniknews.com/columnists/20160...ussia.html

The US Central Intelligence Agency and its media outlets started the conspiracy so let's turn the tables on them. Could the CIA be setting Hillary Clinton up in a false flag hit for the purpose of blaming it on Russia?

This week saw the Washington Post newspaper float a bizarre theory that Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton may have been poisoned by Russian agents on the orders of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Post quoted a renowned US sports-injury doctor as saying that Putin or Republican candidate Donald Trump, working in league, may have induced Clinton's recent bout of ill health.

And the doctor recommended that the Clinton campaign team get a toxicological analysis of her blood carried out, on the suspicion that she may have been poisoned.

For several months now, the 68-year-old former senator's health has been the subject of intense public speculation, not least fanned by her Republican rival Donald Trump.

Apparent facial seizures while addressing public platforms and coughing spasms in front of media reporters culminated last Sunday at a New York event commemorating the 9/11 terror attacks, when Clinton was videoed collapsing on a sidewalk as aides bundled her limp body into the back of a van.

Clinton's campaign team later said she was suffering from pneumonia, which forced her to take three days off from political rallying this week. She has since resumed the stumps, having apparently made a recovery.

However, after weeks of dismissing claims about Clinton's ill-health as wild conjecture, the Washington Post then gives vent to the even wilder notion that the Democrat candidate has been poisoned by Russian agents.

The Post, on one hand, half-acknowledges that the "theory" is far-fetched. Yet, the newspaper one of America's top publications also sneakily adds credence by going on in the same article to reiterate baseless British claims that Russia's Putin ordered the poisoning of Kremlin critic Alexander Livitnenko while he was living in exile in London in 2006.

Livitnenko's death from Polonium poisoning was more likely caused by shady rivals in the criminal underworld. There is no evidence that Russian state agents were involved in his demise. But the claims have provided Western media with plenty of material to continue demonizing Moscow and Vladimir Putin in particular, as the Washington Post article demonstrates.

The latest claim that Clinton has been poisoned by Kremlin agents plays into a litany of false narratives portraying Russia as an evil foreign enemy. From the alleged "annexation" of Crimea, to alleged destabilizing of Ukraine, to the alleged shooting down of a Malaysian civilian airliner in 2014, to alleged "state-sponsored doping" of Olympic athletes.

With this mass media campaign of vilification against Russia and inculcation of pejorative public perception, it is in many ways a logical next step that American spooks in the CIA and closely aligned news outlets like the Washington Post would attempt to implicate Russia in incapacitating Clinton as presidential candidate.

After all, US media in concert with their favored Clinton presidential campaign have been pushing claims that Russian state-sponsored cyber hackers are interfering in the US elections by leaking damaging private information against Clinton. The identity of these hackers may well be American citizens opposed to Clinton.

Alleging that Hillary Clinton has been poisoned by Russia fits neatly in with a full-on US and Western media offensive portraying Russia under Putin as a global threat. The deep forces behind this campaign the CIA and Pentagon are the main beneficiaries from conflict with Russia. Clinton is favored by these forces because, of the two presidential candidates, she is the one who is belligerent towards Moscow. In short, she is the US Deep State's candidate.

And the Deep State's operatives in the mass media consequently row in behind her campaign, working to downplay her trail of corruption, while at the same time maximizing negative coverage of Trump.

But what if the political-media orchestration fails to get Clinton elected in November? Recent polls show that Clinton's lead over Trump is waning to the point where it is neck and neck.

Given the high stakes to get their candidate into the White House, the Deep State is faced with a quandary of a tight race that could go either way. So, there is a need to up the dirty tricks. Touting old Cold War tropes about Russian interference in US politics and Trump being a "Kremlin stooge", the latest desperate bid to escalate fear is the theory that "Putin has poisoned the Democrat candidate".

But hold it a moment. What if Clinton's health impact needed a little bit of "evidentiary proof" that Russian agents were somehow involved?

This is analogous to how US intelligence agents could set up alleged Russian cyber hackers by leaving seeming telltale digital forensics implicating the Russians.

In the scenario of Clinton's health, the CIA could themselves poison her, or cause damage in some other way to her condition, with medication that at a convenient later stage could be tested in such a way as to implicate Russian involvement, just like the Polonium poisoning of Livitnenko.

Think about it. The CIA have the capability, the motive and past record for such devious foul play. It was the CIA that masterminded the assassination of President John F Kennedy out of geopolitical calculations against the Soviet Union. If the organization is capable of taking out a president, then why not take out a presidential candidate?

Blaming Russia on such a dastardly deed would ensure the Deep State's number-two candidate, Clinton's running mate and Pentagon-connected Tim Kaine, would most likely get elected on a wave of patriotic fervor.

The new gung-ho US administration would then pave the way for the CIA-Pentagon, military-industrial complex's desired ramped-up confrontational policy towards Russia. Tens of billions of dollars in military contracts would flow.

To skeptics who say this is preposterous, it should be noted that the US shadow government has shown no compunction whatsoever in the past to sacrifice American lives in the furtherance of its own elitist agenda. The assassination of JFK is a case in point. That led to the lucrative Vietnam War in which 50,000 US troops were killed, as well as up to three million Vietnamese.

Another case in point are the 9/11 terror events which saw three New York skyscrapers implode 15 years ago with the loss of some 3,000 lives. That sabotage points to a false flag incident carried out by US secret forces which then provided the pretext for foreign wars of aggression and empire building, notwithstanding thousands of more American troops killed, as well as over a million Iraqis, Afghanis and others.

It is perhaps nefariously fitting that the latest slander against Russia as having something sinister to do with Clinton's health problems should emerge out of her collapse at a 9/11 commemorative event.

But the real twist in this latest psychological operation against Russia is that Clinton's health impact has nothing to do with alleged poisoning by Russian agents. If anyone is involved it would most likely be the people who form the shadow government of the US.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

[Paul Rigby]

James Corbett ponders the meaning of the MSM's risibly dishonest coverage of the Rodham health story:

Yes, Mainstream Media Bias is Getting Ridiculous...But Why?

[video=youtube_share;n1WfMJ7DmZw]http://youtu.be/n1WfMJ7DmZw[/video]

Published on Sep 14, 2016
SHOW NOTES AND COMMENTS: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=19879

[Paul Rigby]

Hillary's 9/11 Health Letter

Published on Sep 17, 2016

[video=youtube_share;P9E6PlCLCYg]http://youtu.be/P9E6PlCLCYg[/video]

[Paul Rigby]

I incline increasingly to the view that she's dead and has been replaced by a defective robot.

Difficult to disagree given the latest Xray pic following her visit to hospital:



But at least she looks more human now than before.

This constitutes conclusive proof of my case, which I now rest as it's heavy with wet laundry. I can only echo the words of a notorious Brazilian pimp: Case Closed.

Now, where is the nearest place money can be exchanged for alcohol?

I offer the following with the nearest thing I can muster to a straight face. I begin with my favourite title of the year so far:

Mysterious piece of metal flings out of Hillary's pant leg:

[video=youtube_share;YzZl9j580tM]http://youtu.be/YzZl9j580tM[/video]

TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE AT MEMORIAL TODAY, HILLARY CLINTON STUNT DOUBLE?
Posted by Alex Cooper Sep 12, 2016 Breaking News:

https://conservativedailypost.com/two-di...nt-double/

I now move into the slam-dunk phase of my investigation, with my balls of truth arcing unerringly through the hoop of lies, courtesy of The Robot's Confession

Hillary Clinton Explains Why She Doesn't Sweat
by Andrew Desiderio, 2:46 pm, October 12th, 2015

Does Hillary Clinton sweat? Reporters who have watched the Democratic presidential frontrunner this campaign season have noticed that she, quite literally, does not sweat as she is addressing crowds either outdoors or on a hot stage.

BuzzFeed posed the question to Clinton, who initially tried to laugh it off but then got serious about why she doesn't seem to perspire. Basically, she said, she has been doing this for so long that she's used to it.

https://soundcloud.com/anotherroundwithh...-another-1

"You guys are the first to realize that I'm really not even a human being," Clinton joked. "I was constructed in a garage in Palo Alto a very long time ago. … A man whose name shall remain nameless created me in his garage."

It might not have been the best joke for the former Secretary of State, who has been criticized on the campaign trail as lacking authenticity.