09-11-2016, 07:27 PM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:LR Trotter Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:Here's an even better question for the intergalactically stupid, of the 636 times they tried to assassinate Fidel Castro who ordered it? Or, was it just planned by his assassins? SMH....
[size=12]​I make no denial of stupidity, but what is the "it" that "who" ordered? I tend to believe that if the right "who" was involved, the "it" would have occurred. My comment, as stated, in no way should indicate my approval or disapproval, expressed or otherwise, of any "it"!
[/SIZE]
​It appears as though a reply with a quote to this post has been relocated to another thread.
Okay Mr. Trotter, you win. With Mr. Johnson's blessings and approval in hopes he does not find my response offensive, repulsive or otherwise trolling, I will be more than happy to re-locate what I've said so my reply remains in the proper place. Thanking ya'll in advance, as always, I am, very truly.
What the hell am I talking about?
Quote:Mr. Trotter,
I apologize for my post being deleted, please note I had nothing to do with that. I did answer your question, and, though I may not remember word for word what I said, I will do my best to answer it, your question, in the hopes you will read it, my answer, without it, my post, gets deleted again.
Stupidity is not something that can be denied. You ask, what is the "it" that "who" ordered? I said, "who ordered it" being singular, meaning, any assassination attempt on Fidel Castro's life in calculating a daunting total number of 636 times.
Surely, not all 600 assassination attempts on Fidel Castro's life happened all at once? Did it?
With that said, did Richard Helms order any of the hits on Castro's life? Or, did Helms simply allow them, them meaning the "who" to plan, carry out and assassinate Castro?
I also distinctly remember saying the "it" was a representation of Kennedy's assassination, "it" only took one good plan, "it" only took one good shot, and "it" only took one good place to carry "it" out.
I have a lot more to say on this, and as I told someone I would not get myself involved in discussing assassination plots, I am however, responding to your question in the hopes of "it," my post not getting deleted again before you have the chance to read "it," my post. I'm not ignoring you sir.
Mr Kaiser, if you would, please read again my most recent post on another thread. A post that you replied to with a quote, and hopefully you gain a better understanding of my comment. But, in any event, post relocation from thread to thread quite often tends to make conversations, as well as replies, meaningless. I have experienced that practice on another, unrelated forum, when a "moderator" moved some of my posts from one thread to another. The "reasoning" was because said "moderator" opined that another thread was "more appropriate". But, at least one post disappeared, and more than one post, as well as replies, lost their meaning due to relocation and deletion. And, the forum involved was about a subject, and it's history, I knew and remembered quite well. Much more so than any knowledge and/or understanding I have acquired regarding any subject matter on this forum. Rarely do I monitor that forum now, and only posted a couple of replies, over a period of years now, to questions that I knew the answers. Questions that had gone unanswered for a considerable period of time. So, those actions give me reason to rethink my participation on any forum where any of my posts, whether direct by myself, or indirectly by another poster's reply and/or quote, are "relocated" to another thread.
There are two areas regarding John Fitzgerald Kennedy Sr's assassination research that I have studied quite well. One area is the identification of the so called "tramps" that were arrested and paraded through Dealey Plaza some time after the assassination and wounding of John Bowden Connally Jr. I am not sure about the older of the three gentlemen, but I believe that the other two have been correctly identified and are who they claimed to be. My other quite serious study is in regards to the identification of the image seen in the TSBD doorway shadows sometimes referred to as PrayerMan, although I prefer the reference to be PrayerPerson. And, I believe PrayerPerson is female, and therefor is actually PrayerWoman, who in my opinion has been identified. But, I am not trying to debate, nor will I debate, either issue here, on this thread. Although I have studied, and will continue to study all aspects of the murder of our elected US President, the two mentioned areas were of interest in my understanding due to my belief that a lot of misinformation had been expressed in both areas that, I believe, I was able to wade through. Also, I might add, it is very likely that any additional participation on this forum by myself will be quite limited. However, I am sure there are some that will appreciate that.
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch
