Albert Doyle Wrote:There's no excuse for not getting both Davidson's image and Scarf Lady in front of Frazier and asking him who they are?
The fact this isn't being done is a symptom of the poisonous corruption of JFK research by Murphy supporters.
What's next? A Lancer "Excellence In Website Moderation" award for James Gordon???
Larry: Davidson has proven his enhancement with his metadata. Murphy backers call for the metadata but then ignore it (or even censor it) when it shows up.
ahem !
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.
There's an anti-intellectual force out there that is preventing Frazier from being asked what normal JFK research would demand...Tom is obviously afraid we'll get the credit we deserve on this issue which will lead to his Janney material also being threatened.
The focus of this thread continues to be a sincere effort to properly identify ScarfLady, and nothing more. However considering the time frame of filming the TSBD entrance situational occurrences, an occasional everlap between the identity of SL and PP exists. But, an effort continues to avoid such overlaps, and I repeat, the focus of this thread continues to be a sincere effort to properly identify ScarfLady, and nothing more.
Albert Doyle Wrote:Which is why Frazier should be asked and dishonest bullies shouldn't be allowed to obstruct.
Larry: I don't think Scarf Lady is Stanton because Frazier said Stanton was "heavy set".
.
A strong indication exists that ScarfLady is employed at the TSBD building, but so far to my knowledge not properly identified. But as well, among females employed at the TSBD building known to be on the landing/steps a few minutes earlier than the time of the SL film/picture, is Ms SarahStanton and Ms PaulineSanders. So, if SS and PS are provably not candidates, then the question becomes, who else is pictured in/near the entrance portal at and/or near the time, that in all likelihood is employed at the TSBD building, but not otherwise properly identified? In any event, "heavy set" is a perception in the eyes of the beholder. JMO. FWIW.
No Larry, I'm telling you right now that if you go to the Education Forum thread you'll see the Martin Film motion picture of Scarf Lady and her build is slight. That precludes her from being "heavy-set".
When Gordon said he was moderating for quality of information and then banned me after I showed the better quality information (that Stancak has still been unable to answer) I think he violated my legal rights and I'd like to figure out a way to sue him. He can't get away with that.
Albert Doyle Wrote:No Larry, I'm telling you right now that if you go to the Education Forum thread you'll see the Martin Film motion picture of Scarf Lady and her build is slight. That precludes her from being "heavy-set".
When Gordon said he was moderating for quality of information and then banned me after I showed the better quality information (that Stancak has still been unable to answer) I think he violated my legal rights and I'd like to figure out a way to sue him. He can't get away with that.
Yes, you should sue that rounder, Albert. I'll represent you…… pro bono. How about that, sport?
23-02-2017, 12:37 AM (This post was last modified: 26-11-2017, 06:47 PM by LR Trotter.)
Albert Doyle Wrote:No Larry, I'm telling you right now that if you go to the Education Forum thread you'll see the Martin Film motion picture of Scarf Lady and her build is slight. That precludes her from being "heavy-set".
The Hughes Film clip from, I believe, about 12:50pm CST of the TSBD entrance portal shows ScarfLady quite well, and from what I can tell she doesn't appear "slight". I suppose "heavyset" is a matter of opinion. At least regarding comments by BWF. In any event, I am unable to eliminate SS as a candidate for SL.
