"ScarfLady"---TSBD building "employee"?

[LR Trotter]

[size=12]I continue to believe that the provable proper identity of ScarfLady will develop a much enhanced understanding of the situational events as they occurred on the afternoon of 11/22/'63 in Dallas, TX. But again, I make no claims other than that. [/SIZE]

[Albert Doyle]

All efforts should be on Sarah Stanton in my opinion. I'll bet you she turns out to be 5 foot 5 or 6 and the Murphy-ites will do their best to avoid investigation of this.

[LR Trotter]

As seen in many photographs and on film, there were several ladies wearing headscarves as they observed the JFK motorcade travel through DealeyPlaza, and elsewhere as well. In the majority of cases, it appears that they were worn as temporary protection from the elements, mostly wind. However, it seems that quite possibly "ScarfLady" was wearing more of a head wrap/bandana as part of her attire on 11/22/'63, and not as only temporary protection for the outdoor event.

[LR Trotter]

Among those known to be in and/or near the TSBD entrance area at and/or near the 12:30pm CST DealeyPlaza shooting on 11/22/'63, two females employed at the TSBD building stand out, although not properly identified in any film/photograph taken between noon and 1:00pm CST. But, according to their statements and/or testimony, as well as other eyewitness statements and/or testimony, Ms SarahDeanStanton, age 41, and Ms PaulineRebmanSanders, age 55, were both on the top step/landing, at least at about 12:30pm CST, and without any evidence otherwise, a strong possibility exists that ScarfLady, as seen on film a few minutes later, is either PRS, or SDS.

[Albert Doyle]

I'm pretty sure Stanton is ruled out for Scarf Lady Larry because she is obviously not "heavy-set" as Frazier described her. I think she's too old to be 41 too.

[LR Trotter]

I'm pretty sure Stanton is ruled out for Scarf Lady Larry because she is obviously not "heavy-set" as Frazier described her. I think she's too old to be 41 too.

​Quite possibly true, but I suppose my thought is that the most likely among the possibilities is between PRS and SDS, as SL, and as well as any other otherwise unknown/properly identified area occupants at the time frame.

[LR Trotter]

After almost 4 months, after almost 80 replies, and after almost 11,000 views, ScarfLady, as pictured, has yet to be reliably properly identified.

[Ray Mitcham]

After almost 4 months, after almost 80 replies, and after almost 11,000 views, ScarfLady, as pictured, has yet to be reliably properly identified.

It hasn't even been shown that it is a lady.

[LR Trotter]

After almost 4 months, after almost 80 replies, and after almost 11,000 views, ScarfLady, as pictured, has yet to be reliably properly identified.

It hasn't even been shown that it is a lady.

Okay Mr Mitchum. I base my conclusion on what I see of her features and attire that indicates ScarfLady is a female. What is your conclusion as to why my conclusion is wrong? Simply put, what indicates otherwise?

[Ray Mitcham]

After almost 4 months, after almost 80 replies, and after almost 11,000 views, ScarfLady, as pictured, has yet to be reliably properly identified.

It hasn't even been shown that it is a lady.

Okay Mr Mitchum. I base my conclusion on what I see of her features and attire that indicates ScarfLady is a female. What is your conclusion as to why my conclusion is wrong? Simply put, what indicates otherwise?

My conclusion is that the figure in question is too indistinct to tell whether it is a male or a female. You can't tell what its features are, or what it is wearing. Maybe you have special powers which enable you to see what normal people cannot.

p.s. It would be nice if you spelled my name correctly.