Posts: 91
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
James H. Fetzer Wrote:Good, Anthony. They may have shaved his pubic hair to make
him look less masculine. It appears to have been done after he
was dead. Judyth has denied that Lee shaved himself. I believe
her. I appreciate that Anthony has added further explanation.
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
I won't name any names, but certain authors were saying
that the fact that Oswald's pubic hair was shaved is proof that he was a homosexual. I think the idea was to further link him to Ferrie.
Posts: 91
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
I find that not credible. (provide evidence)
These photos were taken at Parkland with LHO freshly deceased.
I believe Dr. Rose dated the autopsy at 2:45 p.m.
If your statement is valid, the DPD "shaving of pubic hairs" took
precedence over the autopsy. Why were they so in need of the hairs?
Before the autopsy? Why shave the whole area, instead of just a sample?
The DPD "theory" makes no sense.
Jack
You didn't seem to understand what I said. I said that the DPD shaved Oswald's pubic hair for evidence while
he was in their custody, while he was alive.
They wanted to compare it to a hair they had found
on the blanket.
So they shaved THE ENTIRE PUBIC AREA TO GET ONE SAMPLE?
Can you document this?
Jack
Maybe if I could figure out how to upload documents with this klunky forum software.
So, since you are such a genius maybe you could explain how they could have shaved ANY sample at all from his pubic area if he was already and always cleanly shaved as we see in the autopsy photo?
Posts: 91
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:I find that not credible. (provide evidence)
These photos were taken at Parkland with LHO freshly deceased.
I believe Dr. Rose dated the autopsy at 2:45 p.m.
If your statement is valid, the DPD "shaving of pubic hairs" took
precedence over the autopsy. Why were they so in need of the hairs?
Before the autopsy? Why shave the whole area, instead of just a sample?
The DPD "theory" makes no sense.
Jack
You didn't seem to understand what I said. I said that the DPD shaved Oswald's pubic hair for evidence while
he was in their custody, while he was alive.
They wanted to compare it to a hair they had found
on the blanket.
So they shaved THE ENTIRE PUBIC AREA TO GET ONE SAMPLE?
Can you document this?
Jack
Maybe if I could figure out how to upload documents with this klunky forum software.
So, since you are such a genius maybe you could explain how they could have shaved ANY sample at all from his pubic area if he was already and always cleanly shaved as we see in the autopsy photo?
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/35/3597-002.gif
Posts: 1,141
Threads: 86
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
Nice point, Anthony. Judyth says he did not shave his pubic area.
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:I find that not credible. (provide evidence)
These photos were taken at Parkland with LHO freshly deceased.
I believe Dr. Rose dated the autopsy at 2:45 p.m.
If your statement is valid, the DPD "shaving of pubic hairs" took
precedence over the autopsy. Why were they so in need of the hairs?
Before the autopsy? Why shave the whole area, instead of just a sample?
The DPD "theory" makes no sense.
Jack
You didn't seem to understand what I said. I said that the DPD shaved Oswald's pubic hair for evidence while
he was in their custody, while he was alive.
They wanted to compare it to a hair they had found
on the blanket.
So they shaved THE ENTIRE PUBIC AREA TO GET ONE SAMPLE?
Can you document this?
Jack
Maybe if I could figure out how to upload documents with this klunky forum software.
So, since you are such a genius maybe you could explain how they could have shaved ANY sample at all from his pubic area if he was already and always cleanly shaved as we see in the autopsy photo?
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
I'm struggling with how to evaluate the relative importance of this matter to the larger goal of effecting justice in the case of the conspiratorial murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
It seems that LHO's pubic hairs indeed were analyzed, and the results of that inquiry were published in the WC volumes.
But I digress.
I await a simple, persuasive argument for the significance of LHO's penis to our shared and ultimate goal.
If LHO had gone to trial, his member may have been introduced into evidence. One can only speculate as to the likelihood of such evidence standing up in court.
It may have led to a hung jury, but again, that's just a guess.
Posts: 1,141
Threads: 86
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
Yes, a well-hung jury! Of course, the real reason is that Judyth has been attacked for allegedly claiming that LHO was uncircumcised, which brought attention to his member, since the coroner had said he was. Even Jack has said that, looking at the photos, he thought he looked uncircumcised. And one thing led to another . . . . (Now return to the first post again.)
Charles Drago Wrote:I'm struggling with how to evaluate the relative importance of this matter to the larger goal of effecting justice in the case of the conspiratorial murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
It seems that LHO's pubic hairs indeed were analyzed, and the results of that inquiry were published in the WC volumes.
But I digress.
I await a simple, persuasive argument for the significance of LHO's penis to our shared and ultimate goal.
If LHO had gone to trial, his member may have been introduced into evidence. One can only speculate as to the likelihood of such evidence standing up in court.
It may have led to a hung jury, but again, that's just a guess.
Posts: 3,038
Threads: 437
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Charles Drago Wrote:I'm struggling with how to evaluate the relative importance of this matter to the larger goal of effecting justice in the case of the conspiratorial murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
It seems that LHO's pubic hairs indeed were analyzed, and the results of that inquiry were published in the WC volumes.
But I digress.
I await a simple, persuasive argument for the significance of LHO's penis to our shared and ultimate goal.
If LHO had gone to trial, his member may have been introduced into evidence. One can only speculate as to the likelihood of such evidence standing up in court.
It may have led to a hung jury, but again, that's just a guess.
And so, members of the jury, it falls to you to decide - cock-up or conspiracy?
You may all rise...
"There are three sorts of conspiracy: by the people who complain, by the people who write, by the people who take action. There is nothing to fear from the first group, the two others are more dangerous; but the police have to be part of all three,"
Joseph Fouche
Posts: 91
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Charles Drago Wrote:I'm struggling with how to evaluate the relative importance of this matter to the larger goal of effecting justice in the case of the conspiratorial murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
It seems that LHO's pubic hairs indeed were analyzed, and the results of that inquiry were published in the WC volumes.
But I digress.
I await a simple, persuasive argument for the significance of LHO's penis to our shared and ultimate goal.
If LHO had gone to trial, his member may have been introduced into evidence. One can only speculate as to the likelihood of such evidence standing up in court.
It may have led to a hung jury, but again, that's just a guess.
Very punny!
I would suggest that we devote another 100 messages to discussing the size of his member. We need someone to come up with a theory that his sexual inadequacy was the real motive for shooting President Kennedy. Maybe someone can make up some testimony from Marina that she ridiculed Lee the night before about the size of his member and lack of sexual prowess as compared to JFK's.
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
The last time I read so much about an erection on a presidential politics-related site was in 2008, on a Japanese Obama blog.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Anthony Marsh Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Good, Anthony. They may have shaved his pubic hair to make
him look less masculine. It appears to have been done after he
was dead. Judyth has denied that Lee shaved himself. I believe
her. I appreciate that Anthony has added further explanation.
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
I won't name any names, but certain authors were saying
that the fact that Oswald's pubic hair was shaved is proof that he was a homosexual. I think the idea was to further link him to Ferrie.
Now that is interesting. Who on earth would desire to "link him to Ferrie"?? Not the Dallas Police, they would not even know of Ferrie? And even if they had learned that name so quickly THIS proves conspiracy, not homosexuality.
Dawn
|
