Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?
Charles Drago Wrote:
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Upon examination of the allegations it appears the preponderance are in no way supportable by the indistinct Altgens6.

The daisy chain of if,then gets only so far as: there were two men in Dallas in long-sleeved shirts.

The End.

Yup.

Finito.

Koniec.

Das Ende.

Not to mention finished. Which in Finnish is päättynyt.

Terminare con estremo pregiudizio, per piacere.
GO_SECURE

monk


"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."

James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
Between my analysis showing 6 items of MISMATCH which lowers the possibility they are the same shirt to ZERO...
Also showing that Oswad changed his clothes with the same authenticity as he was out front with Shelley...
AND that the inventory from Beckley includes said clothes...

How again can a shirt Oswald puts on at 1:00pm at his room be the same short in the photo Altgens photo?

(btw - how many ofus have a nimber of similiar shirts that we wear religiously? Guys like their favorite clothes... there is no reason to believe that Oswald did not have a number of similiar shirts... sure be nice to see photos of ALL the clothes brought from Beckley...)

That an entire website and a handful of "supporters" are buying into this charade is the scary part...

How is this any different from Tom Hanks' desire to tell a fraudulent story about the assassination?

Guess I should just post my rebuttal on JF's site? Think he'd allow counterpoint? :banghead:

Cheers
DJ
David Josephs Wrote:How is this any different from Tom Hanks' desire to tell a fraudulent story about the assassination?

Cheers
DJ

A question easily answered:

Tom Hanks never was a trusted member of the JFK truth and justice community who, intentionally or not, became a Quisling.

Excellent work, David.
David Josephs Wrote:Between my analysis showing 6 items of MISMATCH which lowers the possibility they are the same shirt to ZERO...
Also showing that Oswad changed his clothes with the same authenticity as he was out front with Shelley...
AND that the inventory from Beckley includes said clothes...

How again can a shirt Oswald puts on at 1:00pm at his room be the same short in the photo Altgens photo?

P.S. -- Sorry if, in dunderhead fashion, I missed your analysis. If you haven't already posted it, please do so here on DPF. We could use an early holiday treat.
Charles Drago Wrote:
David Josephs Wrote:Between my analysis showing 6 items of MISMATCH which lowers the possibility they are the same shirt to ZERO...
Also showing that Oswad changed his clothes with the same authenticity as he was out front with Shelley...
AND that the inventory from Beckley includes said clothes...

How again can a shirt Oswald puts on at 1:00pm at his room be the same short in the photo Altgens photo?

P.S. -- Sorry if, in dunderhead fashion, I missed your analysis. If you haven't already posted it, please do so here on DPF. We could use an early holiday treat.

No worries... you went off into your comedy routine discussion and the pages flew by.... (edit: sorry that was Greg... got ya mixed up)

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post61698

Here is the link to the post where it begins... attachment is MY sidebyside... I think #2 - the Sleeve - makes it pretty obvious... Lovelady sitting there shows his sleeve past his wrist while Oswald's barely reaches his wrist... Altgens Doorman shows his sleeve past the wrist...

oh, and he changed clothes... the pulling of the Tshirt that created the arrest T "V" indentation happened at the Theater... and could NOT be evident on the Tshirt in Altgens as that shirt had not yet been worn.

Probability approaching ZERO

DJ
1) Oswald's hair is more abundant at the top middle of his head while Lovelady's dome matches
2) Lovelady's sleeve almost reaches his hand, even when his arm is bent… Oswald's sleeve barely reaches his wrist
3) The T shirt does NOT have a V neck
4) Lovelady has CHEEK BONES L&R match pretty good compared to Oswald's cheeks.
5) Left cheekbone obscures ear, Oswald has no such pronounced cheekbone
6) Lovelady's nose bends right just like Doorman


Each point is salient and compelling: there is a distinct difference in the hair patterns of the two men. The sleeve differential is the most dramatic feature. The Oswald "V" was obviously pulled by a helpful police officer. Lovelady's cheekbones would hold a coffee mug and a set of keys. Lovelady's nose is a cartoon sausage.

One needn't go off into a search for an embroidery needle in an Iowa haystack--the answer is at hand, plain as the nose on his face.

Above notes from attachment at:

[URL="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?9414-TSBD-Doorway-man-Oswald-or-Lovelady&p=61698#post61698"]https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?9414-TSBD-Doorway-man-Oswald-or-Lovelady&p=61698#post61698


[/URL]
Greg Burnham Wrote:Terminare con estremo pregiudizio, per piacere.

So what's the Spanish word for 'poseur'?
Mark Stapleton Wrote:
Greg Burnham Wrote:Terminare con estremo pregiudizio, per piacere.

So what's the Spanish word for 'poseur'?

And what's the Latin translation of, " Here is an idiot who cannot distinguish between Spanish and Italian"???

Wait. I'll give you a hint:

Hic Itali Hispanique stultus qui non discernunt.

Or as my sainted mother would have put it,

Perché ti rifiuti la tua vita con la presenza degli sciocchi?
Mark Stapleton Wrote:
Greg Burnham Wrote:Terminare con estremo pregiudizio, per piacere.

So what's the Spanish word for 'poseur'?

And what's the English given name most commonly assigned to an easy target of fraud, i.e., a "sucker"? As in:

"He's an easy _ _ _ _ for conmen."
GO_SECURE

monk


"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."

James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
Charles Drago Wrote:And what's the Latin translation of, " Here is an idiot who cannot distinguish between Spanish and Italian"???

Communicating in a foreign language on an English language site is simply showing off.

Because a person can't speak Spanish or Italian doesn't make them an idiot.

Rather, it makes the accuser an elitist poseur.


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 182 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 463 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 516 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 545 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 591 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 590 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 718 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 864 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Part IV Gil Jesus 0 644 26-03-2023, 02:10 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Oswald and the Shot at Walker Jim DiEugenio 1 796 24-03-2023, 04:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)