Destiny Betrayed is shipping

[Dawn Meredith]

Page 333:

Therefore Sprague resigned on the evening of March 29, 1977.

The day George DeMohrenschildt sucked a shotgun between Edward Epstein and Gaeton Fonzi.

The day Charles Nicoletti became a lead magnet.

I'd love to see an actuarial study done on the suspicious and convenient deaths in this case.

I agree, someone needs to pick up where the late great Penn Jones left off. He is one of the heroes in this case.
His four volumes of Forgive My Grief are being given to me this summer by a dear friend. They are very hard to find and super expensive.

The loss of Sprague on HSCA ensured the failure of that "investigation".

Dare I say this? Epstein is such a creep that I have long wondered if he shot DeMohrenschildt. Not accusing, just a personal wondering.
Dawn

[Charles Drago]

At least two studies have been conducted -- one that has been quoted extensively, including on promotional materials (posters, etc.) for the film Executive Action, and another to refute the statistical methodologies used to arrive at those numbers.

[Dawn Meredith]

[quote=Phil Dragoo]Page 333:

Therefore Sprague resigned on the evening of March 29, 1977.

The day George DeMohrenschildt sucked a shotgun between Edward Epstein and Gaeton Fonzi.

The day Charles Nicoletti became a lead magnet.

I'd love to see an actuarial study done on the suspicious and convenient deaths in this case.

I agree, someone needs to pick up where the late great Penn Jones left off. He is one of the heroes in this case.
His four volumes of Forgive My Grief are being given to me this summer by a dear friend. They are very hard to find and super expensive.

The loss of Sprague on HSCA ensured the failure of that "investigation".

Dare I say this? Epstein is such a creep that I have long wondered if he shot DeMohrenschildt. Not accusing, just a personal wondering.


Thanks Phil. Another book to order. And find time to read. I have two ahead of it and am not ordering any more til I read those. (Dead Wrong and The Impossible Case against LHO).
So much to do so little time.:banghead:

Dawn

[Phil Dragoo]

http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2013...s-actuary/

Executive Action: JFK Witness Deaths and the London Times Actuary
Richard Charnin
http://richardcharnin.com/
Feb. 25, 2013

Phil's note:

A methodical deconstruction of The Castle's hysterical defense against yet more inconvenient truth

[Magda Hassan]

http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2013...s-actuary/

Executive Action: JFK Witness Deaths and the London Times Actuary
Richard Charnin
http://richardcharnin.com/
Feb. 25, 2013

Thanks Phil!

A methodical deconstruction of The Castle's hysterical defense against yet more inconvenient truth

Seems there is quite a lot of inconvenient truth around.

[Magda Hassan]

I used John Newman's important book Oswald and the CIA as much as possible. Its a disgracefully ignored book I think.

Agreed. And a fantasticly informative book. One cannot possibly have any real understanding of Oswald or the assassination and cover up with out reading it. One of the primary sources fundamental to the case.

[Jim DiEugenio]

Throwing books in the trash?

Literally?

Don't you have a fireplace?

Actually, I don't.

[Charles Drago]

Throwing books in the trash?

Literally?

Don't you have a fireplace?

Actually, I don't.

Good to know.

If I may: Given your position in our community in the role -- among others -- of defender of free speech and expression, you might want to think twice about stating that you trash books.

Books are sacred. At least to me. All books. I would no sooner burn/trash Mein Kampf than I would JFK and the Unspeakable. For examples.

[Charles Drago]

I used John Newman's important book Oswald and the CIA as much as possible. Its a disgracefully ignored book I think.

Agreed. And a fantasticly informative book. One cannot possibly have any real understanding of Oswald or the assassination and cover up with out reading it. One of the primary sources fundamental to the case.

To take full advantage of Newman's books, one should read them as negative templates.

[Jim Hackett II]

Charles, I have no intention of starting a brushfire, but I have to ask.
In what way do you mean to use Ozzie and the CIA as a negative template?

Newman is a spook, given. And Spooks never ever quit.
His first book "Vietnam and JFK" fits my view and opinon much more than the second book Ozzie and the CIA.
Not trying to provide a hotspot to start the BS again, just asking because I am not sure of what You meant.
Jim