Niederhut is voicing a valid issue of how the tolerance of Lone Nutters on The Education Forum affects research, however there is an even better example of damaging tolerance of disinformation in the form of the Prayer Man theory and the Forum's handling of it...James Gordon banned me in 2016 in order to hijack the subject and avoid answering the Davidson Enhancement that clearly showed Prayer Man was a woman...There were many more examples that proved Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton, like Prayer Man's height, however recently Davidson showed a woman's scoop neckline on Prayer Man in Darnell irrefutably ending the issue...James Gordon ignored this vindicating proof and helped slide the thread showing it in to oblivion...Davidson's damning proof was ignored and no recognition of its implications was ever made...Not even by the Lone Nutters...

What this means is the most damaging disinformation on The Education Forum doesn't originate from the Lone Nutters...It originates from the apostate moderators who damage good conspiracy evidence worse than anybody and corrupt the site worse than anyone...It also originates from the cowardly members who watch all this and say nothing...The Prayer Man issue has created the destructive precedent of the Forum attacking and banning important good research and establishing a clique of self-entitled members who are allowed to flagrantly deny good evidence... Since this comes from the moderators and is used against important CT research it is a much more significant offense than anything the Lone Nutters do because, as Niederhut suggests, most credible researchers understand the Lone Nutters are intentionally lying...Niederhut needs to aim a little higher if he is going to challenge how the forum is run and who is guilty of the worst disinformation...

Denny Zartman is someone who wandered in from the internet...Zartman ass-kisses Gordon by pronouncing how there is no Free Speech on the Education Forum because the site is private and can do what it wants...I mean I wonder what point Zartman thinks he is making with that obvious ass-kissing of the main offender Gordon?...Zartman is putting lipstick on a pig because Gordon is just someone they got because no one else wanted to take the job...Gordon is a total incompetent who doesn't know what he is doing and has no academic oversight ability...The source of the problem is Simkin who shirked his responsibilty towards quality of content by hiding behind fake tolerance of opposing opinions in whose shadow many a research troll hides...By crediting himself with tolerance of disinformation trolls Gordon relieves himself of taking responsibility for the intentional lies they post...Zartman sucks up to that and sells out every earnest researcher it betrays...How stupid can you be to see this whole situation and resolve it by boasting there is no Free Speech and praising the oppressors?...Smart people will see the reactive psychological rationalization Zartman is making because he is aware Gordon and The Education Forum are seriously fucked-up...You'll never see Zartman protest my Prayer Man evidence being wrongfully denied...That's something he doesn't risk any skin over while praising the censorers...

(12-08-2024, 05:58 PM)Brian Doyle Wrote: Denny Zartman is someone who wandered in from the internet...Zartman ass-kisses Gordon by pronouncing how there is no Free Speech on the Education Forum because the site is private and can do what it wants...I mean I wonder what point Zartman thinks he is making with that obvious ass-kissing of the main offender Gordon?...Zartman is putting lipstick on a pig because Gordon is just someone they got because no one else wanted to take the job...Gordon is a total incompetent who doesn't know what he is doing and has no academic oversight ability...The source of the problem is Simkin who shirked his responsibilty towards quality of content by hiding behind fake tolerance of opposing opinions in whose shadow many a research troll hides...By crediting himself with tolerance of disinformation trolls Gordon relieves himself of taking responsibility for the intentional lies they post...Zartman sucks up to that and sells out every earnest researcher it betrays...How stupid can you be to see this whole situation and resolve it by boasting there is no Free Speech and praising the oppressors?...Smart people will see the reactive psychological rationalization Zartman is making because he is aware Gordon and The Education Forum are seriously fucked-up...You'll never see Zartman protest my Prayer Man evidence being wrongfully denied...That's something he doesn't risk any skin over while praising the censorers...

Oh, dear! there you go again, Mr. Doyle

Mr. Zartman's wise decision to avoid your Prayer Man "evidence" speaks volumes about how smart he and others are at separating fact from fiction.  Prayer Man is the wrongly-accused, not Sarah Stanton and/or any other woman you try in vain to force into His position out on those Texas School Book Depository steps.  Admittedly I cannot speak for him, but perhaps Mr. Gordon simply doesn't wish to waste his time trying to make sense of your "evidence".