28-11-2015, 05:52 AM
David Josephs Wrote:That analysis comes one the heels of Kaiser's thread naming shooters via Cuesta - there really had to be a shooter in that building at that angle (roof, 3rd floor, 2nd floor) to emulate a shot from TSBD 6th floor... yet if we accept the first story was a Castro backed conspiracy to allow invasion of Cuba then multiple shooters from many angles is desired.
Seems to me that window has a greater % for there being someone peering out than most other areas. The roof of Dal-Tex would be perfect but we don't have any images of that area..
from Spartacus:
In a Cuban television documentary broadcast on November 26, 1993, Escalante named the gunmen who killed John F. Kennedy as three Chicago mobsters (Lenny Patrick, David Yaras, and Richard Cain), and two Cuban exiles (Herminio Diaz Garcia and Eladio del Valle), but said that many in the CIA and elsewhere knew what was going to happen.
The man peering over the fence in Moorman. The West window man. County Records and South Knoll. If indeed we have 5 shooters. They need to be somewhere.
No harm no foul...
DJ
I'd agree that the roof of the Dal Tex was more likely - and there was someone there and shell casings were found up there too, as I remember. Doesn't rule out another poking out the window. Not all likely gunman fired - as they were not needed - the target had been hit and destroyed, along with America......
I don't get into the game of naming the shooters. I think the locations are more important and who was behind the whole plot MUCH more important still. As I often joke, we have now correctly named 40 of the six gunmen. Of the names mentioned, I think many of them were in Dallas and most in the Plaza, but all named gunman could not have been with a rifle in their hands. Remember there were other teams waiting for JFK at the speech venue [should he somehow have gotten through the Plaza without being shot], and each team was likely three - a gunman, a spotter and a radioman communications man. Others were for lookout and crowd control. Some might have been anti-Castro Cubans, but I think some were not, and the very real possibility at least one was French.
IMHO, the cover-up has always been on several levels. The simple cover story [absurd and impossible as it is] for the unwashed, and detailed falsehoods for the research community to chase endless numbers of phantoms and look silly in the eyes of many in the process. There were other aspects of the cover-up too, such as the special one on Mexico City, about flights out of RedBird and others. Preplanned into the whole event was the Plaza and Dallas chock full of covert operative types....just an amazing number of them....they couldn't all have had a part in the 'play', and many were either told to be there just to watch the drama, or to confuse anyone who might try to untangle the plot.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass