10-01-2017, 06:05 PM
What Kamp is really saying without saying it directly is that the lunchroom encounter never happened as illustrated by Baker's affidavit. He is implying that the story of the encounter originated somewhere around Truly's FBI statement and his chat with Fritz. So the logic is they invented the lunchroom encounter on the 22nd somewhere around the time of Fritz's chat with Truly. But why would they then have Baker's statement on record placing Oswald on the 3rd or 4th floor and change it to the lunchroom? Why would they just not stick with Baker's 3rd or 4th floor? Why would they draw suspicion on their own lies by making a record of conflicting stories?
The reason ROKC is desperate to deny the lunchroom encounter is because they are aware that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald at 12:25 and that it doesn't make sense he would go from the lunchroom down to the front steps and back up to the lunchroom in 6 minutes.
Wasn't there a 2nd source for Oswald saying he was in the lunchroom/Domino Room in his interview at the police station?
The research community has gotten weird because Murphy is nothing less than Cinque II but you have mainstream researchers falling for this crap while endorsing ROKC and getting nasty about it. Meanwhile logic like the above gets ignored. After a period posts will be made saying "I am 100% certain the lunchroom encounter didn't happen". The logic for which will be a repetition of ROKC bs that ignores the above. The obvious answer to the question above is that Oswald was still alive when Kamp claims they concocted the lunchroom encounter. They were worried that Oswald would simply mention that he was in the lunchroom when confronted by Baker. In other words they knew it was true and their denial of it would cause problems by making it look like they were trying to hide something. When Truly told his wife about the lunchroom encounter that night he was simply telling the truth. Or you can listen to Bart Kamp and Greg Parker.
The reason ROKC is desperate to deny the lunchroom encounter is because they are aware that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald at 12:25 and that it doesn't make sense he would go from the lunchroom down to the front steps and back up to the lunchroom in 6 minutes.
Wasn't there a 2nd source for Oswald saying he was in the lunchroom/Domino Room in his interview at the police station?
The research community has gotten weird because Murphy is nothing less than Cinque II but you have mainstream researchers falling for this crap while endorsing ROKC and getting nasty about it. Meanwhile logic like the above gets ignored. After a period posts will be made saying "I am 100% certain the lunchroom encounter didn't happen". The logic for which will be a repetition of ROKC bs that ignores the above. The obvious answer to the question above is that Oswald was still alive when Kamp claims they concocted the lunchroom encounter. They were worried that Oswald would simply mention that he was in the lunchroom when confronted by Baker. In other words they knew it was true and their denial of it would cause problems by making it look like they were trying to hide something. When Truly told his wife about the lunchroom encounter that night he was simply telling the truth. Or you can listen to Bart Kamp and Greg Parker.