Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened

[Albert Doyle]

Albert, c'mon, then everything would be distorted.

Bart already dealt with this.

You keep on bringing things up here on this forum that have been contested to death elsewhere. Then you drop all the counter arguments.

Bart is redoing his whole essay with new information and it will be done he says in about three weeks.

I look forward to it. My only problem with Bart's work on this topic is that I wish he someone to help him format stylistically. Then his arguments would be even more pungent.

But IMO, and in the view of many others, he had done some really good work on this issue.

Jim, Bart Kamp is not a serious source. You show seriously bad judgment referencing him. He doesn't post here because he knows he won't survive a fair playing field where Gordon doesn't protect him.


If you go to the Wiegman Film that Sandy Larsen is saying "conclusively" shows Baker veering at the last moment you'll see proof of that lens distortion if you look at the man directly in front of Baker. His head narrows down to about 1/4 width as he moves to the outside of the lens. Larsen is so desperate to confirm the anti-lunchroom encounter theory that he is not considering easily-explained reasons for what he is seeing.


I refuse to believe that Pauline Sanders and Gloria Calvery were approached by spooky men in cloaks and forced to say they saw Baker run right up the steps and into the building. Plus there are no (zero) witnesses for Baker not going right into the building, even though his story is a main part of the official account. ROKC solves this lack of witnessing with the men in black again. It's my honest opinion that both the Baker front step and no lunch-room encounter theories are both complete crap that the JFK research community has been dragged in to by ROKC and is a total waste of time.


Meanwhile, while Gordon has restricted me from posting for reasons he refuses to explain Andrej Stancak is not being asked why he didn't make a cartoon image for ****** *** in his "Overlay" graphic? Jim, Andrej DID make a cartoon image for ****** *** in that graphic. When he did he saw right away it proved what I was saying so he omitted it. Nobody is calling Stancak on that and I am being prevented from doing so for reasons Gordon refuses to explain. That's not very honest...


Davidson is highly praised and has a well-accepted good reputation for input on the Education Forum - except​ when it comes to his Wiegman enhancement that he proved the legitimacy of with his metadata that everybody is ignoring...



.