22-02-2017, 09:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-02-2017, 10:22 PM by Albert Doyle.)
If you want to see a perfect example of what is currently wrong with the JFK research world, Andrej Stancak just posted in the Education Prayer Man thread what can only be called a classic example of ROKC pseudo-analysis where the real evidence is turned inside out, everything is stood on its head, and everything is considered except the real evidence. Andrej is using classic ROKC reasoning to conclude the lunchroom encounter didn't happen in order to bolster the already-debunked Murphy theory. He issues two presumptive lines of reasoning that both try to prove why Oswald couldn't have been seen by Baker in the lunchroom. Only he forgets to mention Carolyn Arnold and her witnessing that is the only real evidence involved with the issue. Classic of ROKC deception, Andrej considers every scenario except the real one. The one where Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald sitting in the lunchroom eating lunch. Stancak does this deliberately in order to deceive the readers for Bart Kamp and ROKC. The reason Stancak deliberately omits this is because he is aware that he is intentionally omitting the 3rd and most likely scenario, that is, that Oswald was in the lunchroom the whole time and walked over to the vestibule window possibly to see who was running down the stairs (Adams & Styles?). Stancak is deliberately trying to avoid the obvious, that is, that Oswald came from the lunchroom side and therefore that perfectly explains Baker's sighting. Stancak is doing this deliberately because he knows that the lunchroom encounter under this scenario precludes the possibility of Prayer Man being Oswald. So Stancak, like ROKC, is deliberately misleading the readers in order to spin things in the direction of his bogus Murphy theories. And to think Lancer is so reckless that it not only doesn't notice this but actually awards ROKC for it really strains credulity. The research community is remiss for not pointing out the obvious in Stancak's dishonest offerings or what they are obviously consciously avoiding.