Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened
LR Trotter Wrote:
I continue to wonder, as I forever wander, and listen to the sounds...of silence.



The answer, Larry, is because the research community fell for Murphy and his bullshit and don't want to admit they were wrong or that people who they patronized disproved them (egos).



When he banned me the fraudulent moderator James Gordon said he was very sensitive to postings because of a potential merge between Lancer and the Education Forum. So in other words he is openly protecting Lancer "Excellence In Research" award winner Bart Kamp from any information that shows his bogusness. And the rest of the community says nothing.


When Andrej Stancak posted his Jerry-built bullshit on the Education Forum Prayer Man thread, when I tried to answer the moderator Gordon would not let my post go through. What Gordon was trying to do was say "Take the hint. Stancak is a credible poster and you're not." The problem here is Gordon is a fool who doesn't understand the first thing about intelligent abstract analysis. He probably ended up in a position of power because no one wanted to take the duty of running the site after Simkin turned it over. Gordon is the type who gravitates to such a position in order to compensate for his intellectual failings. When I was unable to answer Stancak due to Gordon's censorship Jim DiEugenio mocked me saying we would be waiting a long time for my response. It took me a long time via PM's to convince Gordon to follow his own rules and let my response go through. Stancak was literally unable to respond to my post and lied. He said he was too busy and needed time to work on a finer graphics software program to produce his answer. The truth is most of what I wrote did not require any improved graphics to answer. It is obvious to any honest person that Stancak knew he was beaten and was taking advantage of what he knew was a dirty playing field to avoid answering. So in a situation where it is actually Stancak who we'll be waiting a long time for the answer from, DiEugenio is once again ignoring it and is over on the Education Forum thread giving approval to Stancak.


Stancak and the others are allowed to go off topic on the Prayer Man issue and switch the subject to Frazier and the curtain rods. Gordon rode my back in a draconian manner making up forced site rules violations every time I posted. Since he banned me there has been no such restriction of content what so ever and anyone can post basically anything with no fear of moderation from Gordon. So DiEugenio is over on the Education Forum praising Stancak for his diversion to off-topic while ignoring the fact we have been waiting 3 months for an answer from Stancak on my Prayer Man evidence. Gordon doesn't have the wit to realize Stancak isn't credible and is offering seriously flawed material. I think he's moderating for site donations and trying to keep the majority happy by honoring their bogus content and banning those who can disprove it. DiEugenio favors Stancak because he offers enough pseudo-analysis bullshit that people accept it instead of trying to figure it all out. The Education Forum will not be credible until Gordon is justly booted and fair conversation can resume. And hypocrites like DiEugenio need to be publicly shamed.


By the way, we're still waiting for Jim DiEugenio to answer Davidson's metadata and the rest of the community seems happy letting him not. Jim doesn't do well when he can't shut a thread down, so he ignores it. Jim ignores the answer that he mocks you can't give.


What Stancak and the Murphy theorists are trying to do here is attack Frazier's credibility on the curtain rods in order to transpose that lack of credibility to the Prayer Man issue. Without ever directly confronting the evidence, they are trying to say you can't take Frazier at his word because he lied about the curtain rods. Therefore you can ignore his saying he was talking to Sarah Stanton when Calvery ran up. This is entirely dishonest because we have film evidence backing his talking to a person next to him when Calvery ran up. The entire curtain rod off-topic is designed to get around that without ever honestly confronting it, which is a good example of how this Murphy fantasy is perpetuated.




.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened - by Albert Doyle - 14-03-2017, 05:44 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Lunch Room Encounter Brian Doyle 6 1,454 01-04-2023, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Carbine on the Sixth Floor Jim DiEugenio 0 2,485 09-03-2020, 09:13 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Anatomy of the Second Floor Lunchroom Encounter Jim DiEugenio 255 229,321 29-05-2018, 04:45 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Did Dillard film American-born LEE Oswald on sixth floor? Jim Hargrove 9 9,591 12-04-2017, 05:02 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Pierce Allman's encounter with Oswald Tracy Riddle 1 2,919 01-06-2016, 05:42 AM
Last Post: Bob Prudhomme
  The Sniper's Nest Corner boxes in the 6th floor Museum are wrong David Josephs 28 17,298 15-03-2016, 08:47 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  Is this a lefthanded assassin in the 3rd floor Dalt-Tex window? David Josephs 16 12,176 07-01-2016, 07:27 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  what happened to gary shaw? Edwin Ortiz 24 25,405 21-11-2015, 08:16 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Does anyone know what happened to the other Kleins rifles? David Josephs 0 2,093 14-07-2015, 07:01 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Rachel Maddow admits Vietnam war only happened because JFK was assassinated Tracy Riddle 32 12,422 18-06-2015, 05:44 PM
Last Post: Ken Garretson

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)