Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened

[Albert Doyle]

Here is the Rob Clark show where he was dumb enough to allow two clowns to take over his program and have full say. I only listened to the 1:04 mark onward in order to hear the comment Mark Russo warned me about. From what I can hear these two obvious yahoos are trying to discredit the bus and taxi story. Let it be known that James DiEugenio probably signs on to yet another example of main evidence hacking by ROKC. Jim also questions the bus/taxi story, so he probably approves of these two knuckleheads and their boorish presentation. Kamp, whose vocal inflection obviously telegraphs his neanderthalism and lack of credibility, scoffs that the McWatters/Whaley story is probably something I would endorse due to my obvious lack of credibility.


The McWatters/Whaley story is important because it shows evidence for Armstrong's two Oswalds. Remember, ROKC denies Armstrong's theory and attacks it like it does other highly credible assassination evidence. I didn't listen to the rest of the show but I presume Kamp and LeDoux didn't mention Staurt Reed or his obvious nebulous association with taking photos of places where Oswald either was, or should have been, arrested. Especially the bus that was later seen being boarded by the police after Oswald got off. Kamp thuggishly scoff's about Albert Doyle automatically approving of the bus encounter, but he never intelligently confronts the evidence that reinforces it. Nor do these knuckleheads ever mention Frazier, who clearly said Oswald crossed Houston from the Depository and was last seen going up that way.


The bus/taxi encounter shows evidence that the Oswald Frazier saw walking down Houston from the back entrance was indeed one of two Oswalds in the Depository that day. DiEugenio endorses ROKC's denial of Armstrong but then ignores you when you ask him to account for it. Yeah, Albert Doyle very much does endorse the McWatters/Whaley claim, and he does so because it is part of the very important real evidence the ROKC thug pack doesn't fathom because of its incompetency and low brow research. It shows that the Oswald Roger Craig witnessed coming out the front and down the Knoll was indeed a second Oswald whose witnessing cost Craig his life. DiEugenio? - Mute on this very important technical evidence while unaccountably endorsing one of the worst groups to ever be given acceptance in the research community. I believe Hargrove relayed a very intelligent response on the bus/taxi encounter from Armstrong. Meanwhile the community is dumb enough to give serious attention to what are basically two Australian bar room knuckleheads.


Why is ROKC attacking the bus/taxi encounter? Because it shows evidence that some of the Murphy evidence used to deny the lunchroom encounter and make Oswald Prayer Man can possibly be explained by this second Oswald. But we don't need Armstrong to disprove Prayer Man. We've already done that by other analysis. Prayer Man is clearly Sarah Stanton, as all the evidence shows. That some main credible assassination researchers have subjected the community to these jokers is something they'll have to account for.


If you want a good lesson in linguistic forensics listen to Bart Kamp after 1:04 when he interjects several "umm"'s. Overt umming is a sign of knowing what one is saying is dubious. These are the people the community has allowed to hijack the JFK assassination research world. The Albert Doyle scoff is around 1:06 -





https://www.spreaker.com/user/thelonegun...on-getaway




.