13-04-2017, 12:52 AM
Not fair Lauren. Jim should be allowed to answer how Harry Holmes was a notorious insider for the Commission. Therefore any testimony coming from him should be properly scrutinized.
I believe wiser Deep Political analysis would make Mr Mitcham acknowledge that he was relating the testimony of somebody who was watching the event from all the way across the Plaza in the Terminal Annex Building. Ray is entering the testimony of a person who was a well-known disinformationist for the Commission and is speaking about something he did not witness while he was 1000 feet away in his office looking at the railroad yard through binoculars at the time according to his Commission testimony. Jim knows this but doesn't point it out.
It is only fair to ask both Mr Mitcham and Jim to account for how the testimony of a government perjurer whom Jim himself helped expose, who was 1000 feet away and in his office at the time, could possibly be relevant evidence towards the lunchroom encounter claim?
I believe wiser Deep Political analysis would make Mr Mitcham acknowledge that he was relating the testimony of somebody who was watching the event from all the way across the Plaza in the Terminal Annex Building. Ray is entering the testimony of a person who was a well-known disinformationist for the Commission and is speaking about something he did not witness while he was 1000 feet away in his office looking at the railroad yard through binoculars at the time according to his Commission testimony. Jim knows this but doesn't point it out.
It is only fair to ask both Mr Mitcham and Jim to account for how the testimony of a government perjurer whom Jim himself helped expose, who was 1000 feet away and in his office at the time, could possibly be relevant evidence towards the lunchroom encounter claim?
Quote:Mr. BELIN. Where were you on November 22, 1963, around noon or so. That in the day of the assassination?
Mr. HOLMES. I was in my office on the fifth floor of the terminal annex building. located at the corner of Houston and Commerce Streets, Dallas, Tex.
~ ~ ~
Mr. HOLMES. I had a pair of 7 1/2 x 50 binoculars.
Mr. HOLMES. I watched for hours from that vantage point up there with my binoculars, hoping I would see someone running across the railroad tracks, or maybe that I could get word to the police as to where they were, because it was like a birdseye view of the panorama of the whole area.
Mr. BELIN. Did you see anyone run across the railroad track?
Mr. HOLMES. No. I saw nothing suspicious and I am a trained suspicioner.