13-04-2017, 03:35 AM
Jim, do you think it is fair to allow Holmes, who wasn't even there, to be quoted on this issue? Holmes is jumbling information that was related to him second-hand after the fact. He might be mixing hearsay of Roger Craig's Oswald being stopped at the front door with the lunchroom incident. This kind of mixing up would be expected from someone who wasn't there. You would never allow it in any other instance where you were seriously criticizing evidence.
I've read Kamp's lunchroom encounter claims. They are deliberate distortions of the evidence trying to stretch it in favor of Murphy. Kamp actually doubts that Campbell saw Baker go in and uses the weak excuse that he only said "officer". Kamp avoids accounting for the fact that Baker was the only officer in the area that would fit the description at the time. And Miller showed Piper and West saw Baker & Truly enter in perfect timing to Campbell's witnessing. There's a lot of dishonest evidence skewing going on with this issue that isn't very credible and doesn't represent good assassination research methods.
I'm still waiting for anyone to honestly answer how Truly could tell his wife about a lunchroom encounter that never happened on Friday night? It is fully possible that Campbell didn't go in to the foyer until Mrs Reid's Oswald came down the stairs. Campbell doesn't give a specific time of when he saw Oswald in the foyer storage room. Kamp ignores that there were a lot of other people in the foyer at the time Campbell speaks of. None of them spoke of seeing Oswald.
Jim you've recently come out in favor of Armstrong on the Education Forum. The people who doubt the lunchroom encounter also doubt Armstrong, so they grant themselves the privilege of ignoring how some of those conflicting witnessings might be explained by the second Oswald Roger Craig witnessed. I find your avoidance of this to be less than honest...
No researcher who has fought hard and endured hardships against a majority, who has proven his case, should ever be subject to persecution on this site. No person on this site has a right to dismiss their own accountability to provable facts.
Jim, it is totally dishonest to say Oswald placed himself on the 1st floor. You're using ROKC methods here of leaving out just enough information to suggest that Oswald was saying he was out front. He never said that anywhere and ROKC is lying when they misconstrue the context of Fritz's notes. Oswald clearly said he was somewhere in the Domino Room or lunchroom during the shots and it is totally dishonest to suggest otherwise. He was where Carolyn Arnold saw him at 12:24 and where Baker saw him 6 1/2 minutes later.
I've read Kamp's lunchroom encounter claims. They are deliberate distortions of the evidence trying to stretch it in favor of Murphy. Kamp actually doubts that Campbell saw Baker go in and uses the weak excuse that he only said "officer". Kamp avoids accounting for the fact that Baker was the only officer in the area that would fit the description at the time. And Miller showed Piper and West saw Baker & Truly enter in perfect timing to Campbell's witnessing. There's a lot of dishonest evidence skewing going on with this issue that isn't very credible and doesn't represent good assassination research methods.
I'm still waiting for anyone to honestly answer how Truly could tell his wife about a lunchroom encounter that never happened on Friday night? It is fully possible that Campbell didn't go in to the foyer until Mrs Reid's Oswald came down the stairs. Campbell doesn't give a specific time of when he saw Oswald in the foyer storage room. Kamp ignores that there were a lot of other people in the foyer at the time Campbell speaks of. None of them spoke of seeing Oswald.
Jim you've recently come out in favor of Armstrong on the Education Forum. The people who doubt the lunchroom encounter also doubt Armstrong, so they grant themselves the privilege of ignoring how some of those conflicting witnessings might be explained by the second Oswald Roger Craig witnessed. I find your avoidance of this to be less than honest...
No researcher who has fought hard and endured hardships against a majority, who has proven his case, should ever be subject to persecution on this site. No person on this site has a right to dismiss their own accountability to provable facts.
Jim, it is totally dishonest to say Oswald placed himself on the 1st floor. You're using ROKC methods here of leaving out just enough information to suggest that Oswald was saying he was out front. He never said that anywhere and ROKC is lying when they misconstrue the context of Fritz's notes. Oswald clearly said he was somewhere in the Domino Room or lunchroom during the shots and it is totally dishonest to suggest otherwise. He was where Carolyn Arnold saw him at 12:24 and where Baker saw him 6 1/2 minutes later.