14-04-2017, 06:12 PM
Ray is a welcomed ROKC member. What he offers is a direct transposition of the parsing semantics specialized in by Bart Kamp over on Greg Parker's website. But you can see how he and Jim D achieve that level of brainwashing by ignoring all that reasonably counters it. Ray ignores the content of my post because it doesn't allow him to practice the forced illusion that Kamp has gotten the community to buy. What you are seeing here are ROKC evidence-cookers who offer things like "but he said officer and didn't specify Baker". When you point-out that Baker was established as being the only officer in the area who it could be Jim and Ray ignore you and then start referring to you negatively in their ROKC proxying.
What is happening here is like Fetzer and Cinque prevailing and convincing a lesser skilled and lazy community anxious to find new evidence against the Commission that Doorway Man was actually a good theory and then getting those who impose themselves as research website authorities to go along with it and marginalize those who can refute that garbage theory under the guise of site rules. Those less involved researchers then give the nod to people like Jim D without ever having entered anything credible on the subject themselves. This intellectual delinquency has led to a monstrously uncredible troll group suddenly gaining credibility and being taken seriously. It is unbelievable that what we have happening here is like Fetzer and Cinque now getting automatic moderator-enforced license because some self-appointed research 'authorities' simply give Jim automatic approval without checking his facts.
What Ray is doing here is very similar to Fetzer's MO. It is just a suggestive emphasis on sophist contrivance while accenting words and attacking shadows in the evidence that are cooked-up by ROKC-like hocus pocus that has zero evidence behind it. If you look at what Kamp offers it is just a repetition of this wishful insertion of realness into his forced doubt until it is repeated so many times that it is then referred to as the better interpretation, but as Ray shows here it is achieved by the dishonest ignoring of that which counters it. For some reason the Darnell Film has a distortion that shows Baker veering off before running up the steps. This film quirk has now become the basis for more years of ROKC bullshit gumming up the community with Jim D's full encouragement and those who criticize Jim being punished by unaccountable moderators.
Thanks to Jim we now have what can only be seen as Fetzer and Cinque running the community and being the deciding factor in who is allowed to post. Corrupted moderators like Gordon use Jim's opinion as guidance in their censorship. Jim plays them like a fiddle and the unaccounted for result is the nightmarish travesty of a clown like Kamp getting 'Excellence In Research' awards with those who support it saying things like "but his lunchroom stuff is completely independent research". What you are seeing here is a take-over of the community by a lesser skilled mob that practices a form of tabloid-type research in order to bolster anti-Warren Commission claims, as Gilbride posted and was then censored by that same mob and its watchdog moderators. The lack of challenge of those posters and automatic approval by friends has led to a dangerous level of bad research being indirectly approved by the community. The community is frittering into a popularity club that is willing to pass off faulty claims in order to keep superficial interest going in the assassination. It is violating the higher standard of rigor it used to define itself by. ROKC operates by a very simple method of assuming that since the Commission corrupted the evidence there is unlimited opportunity to insert any kind of fantastic meaning into that void. It does it to the maximum result in order to gain notariety for unskilled "researchers" like Bart Kamp and Andrej Stancak. Unscrutinizing moderators see this mob and react to their industriousness and volume of research. They see the majority like it so they judge accordingly and thereby accept some of the worst garbage research to ever be introduced to the community. Because of the non-involvement of the community the ROKC mob's posts have quietly become the norm and those offering the better wisdom are disparaged. When Stan Dane spoke of me in his video he simply said I was banned and skipped over me. Like Ray and Jim he never addressed my evidence because he knew he couldn't. What this shows is the mob directly uses this unfair moderation as justification of its doings. They work off each other and they have not accounted for the bad evidence they have introduced.
He says while ignoring my post...
What is happening here is like Fetzer and Cinque prevailing and convincing a lesser skilled and lazy community anxious to find new evidence against the Commission that Doorway Man was actually a good theory and then getting those who impose themselves as research website authorities to go along with it and marginalize those who can refute that garbage theory under the guise of site rules. Those less involved researchers then give the nod to people like Jim D without ever having entered anything credible on the subject themselves. This intellectual delinquency has led to a monstrously uncredible troll group suddenly gaining credibility and being taken seriously. It is unbelievable that what we have happening here is like Fetzer and Cinque now getting automatic moderator-enforced license because some self-appointed research 'authorities' simply give Jim automatic approval without checking his facts.
What Ray is doing here is very similar to Fetzer's MO. It is just a suggestive emphasis on sophist contrivance while accenting words and attacking shadows in the evidence that are cooked-up by ROKC-like hocus pocus that has zero evidence behind it. If you look at what Kamp offers it is just a repetition of this wishful insertion of realness into his forced doubt until it is repeated so many times that it is then referred to as the better interpretation, but as Ray shows here it is achieved by the dishonest ignoring of that which counters it. For some reason the Darnell Film has a distortion that shows Baker veering off before running up the steps. This film quirk has now become the basis for more years of ROKC bullshit gumming up the community with Jim D's full encouragement and those who criticize Jim being punished by unaccountable moderators.
Thanks to Jim we now have what can only be seen as Fetzer and Cinque running the community and being the deciding factor in who is allowed to post. Corrupted moderators like Gordon use Jim's opinion as guidance in their censorship. Jim plays them like a fiddle and the unaccounted for result is the nightmarish travesty of a clown like Kamp getting 'Excellence In Research' awards with those who support it saying things like "but his lunchroom stuff is completely independent research". What you are seeing here is a take-over of the community by a lesser skilled mob that practices a form of tabloid-type research in order to bolster anti-Warren Commission claims, as Gilbride posted and was then censored by that same mob and its watchdog moderators. The lack of challenge of those posters and automatic approval by friends has led to a dangerous level of bad research being indirectly approved by the community. The community is frittering into a popularity club that is willing to pass off faulty claims in order to keep superficial interest going in the assassination. It is violating the higher standard of rigor it used to define itself by. ROKC operates by a very simple method of assuming that since the Commission corrupted the evidence there is unlimited opportunity to insert any kind of fantastic meaning into that void. It does it to the maximum result in order to gain notariety for unskilled "researchers" like Bart Kamp and Andrej Stancak. Unscrutinizing moderators see this mob and react to their industriousness and volume of research. They see the majority like it so they judge accordingly and thereby accept some of the worst garbage research to ever be introduced to the community. Because of the non-involvement of the community the ROKC mob's posts have quietly become the norm and those offering the better wisdom are disparaged. When Stan Dane spoke of me in his video he simply said I was banned and skipped over me. Like Ray and Jim he never addressed my evidence because he knew he couldn't. What this shows is the mob directly uses this unfair moderation as justification of its doings. They work off each other and they have not accounted for the bad evidence they have introduced.
Quote:Right. Which means you can't back up what you said. Got it.
He says while ignoring my post...