14-04-2017, 06:33 PM
Ray Mitcham Wrote:Great response, Mr Trotter. Maybe you could show how anybody prove that something didn't happen. You only have Truly and Baker's word's (and that at the second try) for something which allegedly happened.
This is false and Ray is being allowed to get away with it.
Miller showed that Ochus Campbell saw Baker and Truly run in the building. They quietly ignore it like Ray is doing here because they know it refutes their dishonest spin. Community moderators have helped Ray ignore this information and they don't account for it.
Miller also showed that Piper and West saw Baker & Truly enter right in line with Campbell's witnessing. The anti-lunchroom encounter people deal with this obvious evidence like Ray does above. They aggressively turn on their attacking of the evidence overblowing specks and concentrating on disingenuous interpretation of words while ignoring the obvious. Their spin is conspicuously dependent on the suggestion that the Warren Commission should have presented exactly accurate facts. They ignore that the Commission had a motive in muddying the evidence in the Depository in order to divert from Oswald being exonerated by being in the lunchroom. Or perhaps in order to cover-up the Oswald doubles.
These people deal from the position of standing on nothing but ROKC-generated, speculation-driven wishful thinking but then have the nerve to speak in a tone of implied authority and accusation of failing to meet their standards...This is how ROKC manages to convert years-worth of evidence-free speculation and evidence contrivance into a solid case people are heckled for not answering...When you point-out that no one saw the allegedly delaying Baker lingering outside they simply ignore you...