25-03-2023, 09:55 PM
Brian, that is a superlative comparison of the film forensics- Wiegman shows the west corner of the landing, hidden in Altgens... meaning PrayerMan must be Sarah Stanton, independent of other considerations that point to PrayerMan as being Stanton.
It seems when you say "The Hughes film shows Lovelady all the way to the right of the portal", you are meaning "the west side of the portal."
*
It has been very obvious for many years that PrayerMan is NOT Lee Harvey Oswald. When Sean Murphy presented his argument in a 2013 EdForum thread, he didn't present a height analysis. Instead he relied on TSBD employees' recollections of their whereabouts, and the vague similarity of a photographic blur to Oswald.
This is the height of intellectual arrogance. It assumes that everybody had perfect recall, so Sean could make a deduction (based on those memories) that "proves" that PrayerMan is Oswald. And thereby ram such a radical proposition down everyone's throats.
Nevermind that simple physics proves otherwise- PrayerMan is a full head shorter than Wesley Frazier.
And the way this has played out, almost 10 years now, is anybody who believes Sean Murphy is a nice guy also believes PrayerMan is Oswald. Eventually, if enough of a consensus is built, all it will take is a vote to determine the truth about Oswald's whereabouts.
Anybody who believes Sean Murphy is mistaken is not a nice guy. Naysayers have been subject to gangstalking from the apemen who make up the consensus.
And so the correct interpretation, as to who was actually on the west portion of the TSBD landing, gets suppressed. This plays right into the hands of the intelligence operatives who control the EdForum. Sean Murphy has succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of any CIA disinformation specialist. Because of his arrogant, short-sighted hypothesis, thousands of man-hours have been wasted pursuing a blurry image who, all along, was Sarah Stanton.
Sean Murphy thereby has wasted the most precious resource in dozens of researchers' lives- their time. Maybe he's not such a nice guy after all.
It will take a personal act of courage from former believers to disengage from the Murphyite cult- to get free of the bonds of their ignorance. And to further realize that, yes, Oswald was in the 2nd-floor lunchroom during the shooting sequence.
PrayerMan as Oswald has just been a deceptive ruse to bolster another ruse, the lunchroom hoax theory. When researchers mature enough, to disavow the Murphy/Parker/Kamp regressive dogma, they might start applying their detective instincts to find answers to: Why was Oswald in the 2nd-floor lunchroom?
It seems when you say "The Hughes film shows Lovelady all the way to the right of the portal", you are meaning "the west side of the portal."
*
It has been very obvious for many years that PrayerMan is NOT Lee Harvey Oswald. When Sean Murphy presented his argument in a 2013 EdForum thread, he didn't present a height analysis. Instead he relied on TSBD employees' recollections of their whereabouts, and the vague similarity of a photographic blur to Oswald.
This is the height of intellectual arrogance. It assumes that everybody had perfect recall, so Sean could make a deduction (based on those memories) that "proves" that PrayerMan is Oswald. And thereby ram such a radical proposition down everyone's throats.
Nevermind that simple physics proves otherwise- PrayerMan is a full head shorter than Wesley Frazier.
And the way this has played out, almost 10 years now, is anybody who believes Sean Murphy is a nice guy also believes PrayerMan is Oswald. Eventually, if enough of a consensus is built, all it will take is a vote to determine the truth about Oswald's whereabouts.
Anybody who believes Sean Murphy is mistaken is not a nice guy. Naysayers have been subject to gangstalking from the apemen who make up the consensus.
And so the correct interpretation, as to who was actually on the west portion of the TSBD landing, gets suppressed. This plays right into the hands of the intelligence operatives who control the EdForum. Sean Murphy has succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of any CIA disinformation specialist. Because of his arrogant, short-sighted hypothesis, thousands of man-hours have been wasted pursuing a blurry image who, all along, was Sarah Stanton.
Sean Murphy thereby has wasted the most precious resource in dozens of researchers' lives- their time. Maybe he's not such a nice guy after all.
It will take a personal act of courage from former believers to disengage from the Murphyite cult- to get free of the bonds of their ignorance. And to further realize that, yes, Oswald was in the 2nd-floor lunchroom during the shooting sequence.
PrayerMan as Oswald has just been a deceptive ruse to bolster another ruse, the lunchroom hoax theory. When researchers mature enough, to disavow the Murphy/Parker/Kamp regressive dogma, they might start applying their detective instincts to find answers to: Why was Oswald in the 2nd-floor lunchroom?