08-09-2012, 03:21 AM
Albert, we are still waiting for your research on the "break ins" at Mary's. WHen will you ever show us some results as to how it could relate to her death. If you have none, then may I say, "oh my aching back?"
As per Doug Horne and his plaint about Mitchell not taking action, uh maybe because he doesn't know about it. Or maybe because like many of us he thinks that Janney's book with its Second Crump, the skin switching killer, the clothes delivered in the nick of time, the "Vivian" excuse which has appeared to the impeached, the JFK as Cold Warrior in 1961, the Mary Meyer who digested the WR in two weeks without the evidence, the Prouty notes that Janney never checked on etc etc, is just too silly to reply to since no one with any gravitas could take it seriously?
But I can see why Doug Horne wouldreply that way. His review was later showed up as lacking gravitas.
As per Doug Horne and his plaint about Mitchell not taking action, uh maybe because he doesn't know about it. Or maybe because like many of us he thinks that Janney's book with its Second Crump, the skin switching killer, the clothes delivered in the nick of time, the "Vivian" excuse which has appeared to the impeached, the JFK as Cold Warrior in 1961, the Mary Meyer who digested the WR in two weeks without the evidence, the Prouty notes that Janney never checked on etc etc, is just too silly to reply to since no one with any gravitas could take it seriously?
But I can see why Doug Horne wouldreply that way. His review was later showed up as lacking gravitas.