DK Wilson Wrote:By way of introduction, I'll say the following: though I've been a member of this forum for some time now, I have never posted a single thread here.
From this vantage point it is apparent that those of you who are at odds with Professor Fetzer and by extension, Ralph Cinque, are missing the core of Prof. Fetzer's assertion (and yes, the proper mention of, or salutation for a former professor is, "Professor", or alternatively you may refer to him as "Dr. Fetzer").
No, "DK Wilson" -- You've never posted until now because you haven't been assigned to post until now.
You demonstrate not the slightest authority to lecture anyone of substance on this forum regarding what they may be "missing."
DKW shown carrying the combined weight of bloviators, disinformation artists, red herrings, numerous strawmen, arguments from the Church Lady's hemorrhoid suppository case, and sundry ruses, veiled aspersions, bald-faced lies, uproarious renditions of Mel Brooks' The Producers.
Having researched this from the time of Miss Brooks' third-grade class as an assignment for show and tell, thirty years later, having exhausted the tens of thousands of files released under the JFK Act and various FOIA suits, he comes with the mud-wrestling bathos of Don Felzswoop and Cincho Pasta.
Albert, we are still waiting for your research on the "break ins" at Mary's. WHen will you ever show us some results as to how it could relate to her death. If you have none, then may I say, "oh my aching back?"
As per Doug Horne and his plaint about Mitchell not taking action, uh maybe because he doesn't know about it. Or maybe because like many of us he thinks that Janney's book with its Second Crump, the skin switching killer, the clothes delivered in the nick of time, the "Vivian" excuse which has appeared to the impeached, the JFK as Cold Warrior in 1961, the Mary Meyer who digested the WR in two weeks without the evidence, the Prouty notes that Janney never checked on etc etc, is just too silly to reply to since no one with any gravitas could take it seriously?
But I can see why Doug Horne wouldreply that way. His review was later showed up as lacking gravitas.
Dr Pepper is the soda of Texas?:drink: Evidence of Oswald's innocence is circumstantial?:argue: I thought guilt is what needs to be proved, not innocence.
American law. Innocent until proven guilty. Oswald was murdered to avoid a trial and the exposure of the conspiracy's facilitators and mechanics.
Barry Krusch performs a lively and enjoyable bull kabob on the two or three--no, three--shells maybe found, definitely marked--no, maybe marked, definitely found--and he goes on for pages presenting the contradictory testimony, the broken chain of custody, the evidence of guilty revision, and ultimately the exclusion of the shells.
Jim DiEugenio destroys the magic bullet in his day in the life of CE 399.
Gil Jesus and George Michael Evica present a compelling case that Lee never ordered, received, practiced with, stored, transported or fired the alleged kill weapon.
And on, and on, and on.
Yet the Red Herring Factory insists that all those wishing to see the kingdom of heaven must Line Up Here between the ropes of their theme park, Strawmania.
I love the jingle.
I'm a Pepper, he's a Pepper, Lee's a Patsy, wouldn't you like to be free of all these moles.
DKW shown carrying the combined weight of bloviators, disinformation artists, red herrings, numerous strawmen, arguments from the Church Lady's hemorrhoid suppository case, and sundry ruses, veiled aspersions, bald-faced lies, uproarious renditions of Mel Brooks' The Producers.
Having researched this from the time of Miss Brooks' third-grade class as an assignment for show and tell, thirty years later, having exhausted the tens of thousands of files released under the JFK Act and various FOIA suits, he comes with the mud-wrestling bathos of Don Felzswoop and Cincho Pasta.
:coffeescreen:
Oh, god, there goes another keyboard!
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Albert, we are still waiting for your research on the "break ins" at Mary's. WHen will you ever show us some results as to how it could relate to her death. If you have none, then may I say, "oh my aching back?"
I don't know. I think a good researcher looks at the bigger picture and says to himself that wacking a woman like Mary Meyer would be a lot easier than murdering a president. Mary Meyer's peer group was one that would not open-up to criticism or investigation of covert doings. The murderers would be a much smaller and more effective cell because the target would not take as much organizing to overcome the huge security and attention a president has around him. This is a scenario where there wouldn't be that much evidence and the exposed edges where witnesses would talk about what happened would be much more restricted to intel wolf bastards who would be unlikely to talk. Sort of like John Lennon. The Kennedy assassination was cracked because it involved too large a conspiracy that happened to border on public witnesses. Less so with people like Meyer or Lennon. Notice that both Lennon and Meyer were hit while traversing their regular egresses to their artwork that could be studied by persons targeting them.
I just don't see the break-ins as being fabricated. The only reason disinformationists would have to invent the break-ins would be to create a scenario of persecution that they would then use to float further disinformation like, possibly, the diary or the Leary sex den sessions etc. I don't see that however because there really isn't any need to draw attention to covert interest in Mary Meyer that would only draw suspicions over how she died. I believe, sex den or not, someone was worried about Mary Meyer because of her peace politics. This would perfectly match the covert interest and scope of covert alert seen in other assassination witnesses. If the persons who murdered JFK knew they murdered him partly because of his peace politics they would be worried about persons whom JFK had associated with who had the same leanings and might have heard JFK voice them. You argue against the Douglass grain Mr D. I find it very important that Mary Meyer separated from Cord Meyer because she preserved her peace leanings and he went on to become hard core CIA. The story you heard might have been Cord was spending too much time at the office - but that was probably a polite way of saying they had irreconcilable political differences based on Cord's CIA politics. Something inner-circle Mary Meyer couldn't say directly. This is very important because it would give credence to JFK's association with Meyer and CIA's possible worry over it - even without the LSD embellishment.
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:As per Doug Horne and his plaint about Mitchell not taking action, uh maybe because he doesn't know about it. Or maybe because like many of us he thinks that Janney's book with its Second Crump, the skin switching killer, the clothes delivered in the nick of time, the "Vivian" excuse which has appeared to the impeached, the JFK as Cold Warrior in 1961, the Mary Meyer who digested the WR in two weeks without the evidence, the Prouty notes that Janney never checked on etc etc, is just too silly to reply to since no one with any gravitas could take it seriously?
But I can see why Doug Horne wouldreply that way. His review was later showed up as lacking gravitas.
Well, let's inform Mitchell of it and ask for an answer. Why be shy? Seems like he could clear-up some of the Damore stuff, or, perhaps, expose himself by giving explanations that could be disproven by research.
I think Mary Meyer didn't need to read the entire Warren Report because if she had an insider's view of Kennedy's beliefs and the assassination, as well as an ear on CIA social circle scuttlebutt, she would have had a good running start that precluded the necessity of reading the entire report. The issuance of the Report could have created a timely juncture that CIA would be worried about. A sharp researcher would see that CIA acted quickly during other such junctures like Dorothy Kilgallen and Jimi Hendrix. So contrary to what you assert it very likely was the issuance of the Report itself that created the quick need to remove Mary Meyer because it might have instigated a response that would be very damaging to CIA's interests, especially with Mary Meyer's Washington/JFK credentials. Sorry, but opinions based on applied doubt and courtroom-type gotcha points are of less value than total scrutiny based on known precedent and the greater picture. I'm absolutely convinced Mary Meyer was covertly assassinated by CIA. The gravity is exactly what is all there in the right places.
No, not speechless. I just find it difficult to write anything without resorting to using an inordinate amount of profanity these days. But, thanks so much for asking.
Sometimes I just have to: hutup:
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
hutup: