28-03-2014, 12:57 AM
Don J.
I agree with you. Hence I have no problem with people in this thread questioning, debating or countering Greg P.'s arguments. Equally, I don't think people need to drag accusations of cointelpro into the discussion to do so.
David J.
(deleting the comedy gifs and the bit where David tells me to 'F' off - seriously, isn't DPF better than this?)
Greg P has a longer history in JFK research than just this thread, and your accusation of cointelpro would need to coherently address that to be taken seriously. I'd outline it for you but I don't appreciate being told to f. off or being called a kiss-ass after I simply requested the debate not jump the shark into the final ultimatum of cointelpro dismissals. Also, telling me to go away to another forum is unpleasant to read after I've made any number of useful and constructive posts at this site. (My lengthy reconstruction of the Elinoff saga a year or more ago - frankly a bitch to write and research, and unique to the DPF - was validated in my eyes when the subject under discussion contacted me privately and told me my thread here was very accurate as to what happened). All of this is very easily fixed though. Please stick to disagreeing with or refuting Greg's posts (which, again, I'm fine with if you do), rather than terminating the debate with a cointelpro accusation.
Quote:Anthony,
You don't have to accuse someone of being part of COINTELPRO to question their arguments.
I agree with you. Hence I have no problem with people in this thread questioning, debating or countering Greg P.'s arguments. Equally, I don't think people need to drag accusations of cointelpro into the discussion to do so.
David J.
(deleting the comedy gifs and the bit where David tells me to 'F' off - seriously, isn't DPF better than this?)
Quote:Mr Thorne... when someone comes here TELLING us what are facts and what are not... and has yet to be right once...
while making it a point to discuss tonsils ad nauseum on a forum dedicated to the deep political implications of what and why the FBI produced reams of fraudulent data with regards to the assassination of the president..
Greg P has a longer history in JFK research than just this thread, and your accusation of cointelpro would need to coherently address that to be taken seriously. I'd outline it for you but I don't appreciate being told to f. off or being called a kiss-ass after I simply requested the debate not jump the shark into the final ultimatum of cointelpro dismissals. Also, telling me to go away to another forum is unpleasant to read after I've made any number of useful and constructive posts at this site. (My lengthy reconstruction of the Elinoff saga a year or more ago - frankly a bitch to write and research, and unique to the DPF - was validated in my eyes when the subject under discussion contacted me privately and told me my thread here was very accurate as to what happened). All of this is very easily fixed though. Please stick to disagreeing with or refuting Greg's posts (which, again, I'm fine with if you do), rather than terminating the debate with a cointelpro accusation.