01-04-2014, 12:07 PM
Jim Hargrove Wrote:Greg R Parker Wrote:But even if you run with it being rare, growing back is still an eminently more probable explanation that a doppelganger.
Not if you consider the other physical evidence as well. You must also assume that the mastoidectomy scar disappeared between the Marine corps years and the autopsy, and that a six-year-old gunshot wound to the elbow completely disappeared by then too. And then there is the big picture....
Oswald was clearly impersonated in Mexico City, he was clearly impersonated in and around Dallas in the weeks leading up to the assassination, he was clearly in Japan and Taiwan (Formosa) simultaneously in the Marines, and on and on. At some point, you have to see a trend.
1. Scars do fade. Mastoidectomy scar was three inches at enlistment down to one inch at detachment. And I have explained why it became visible again when exhumed.
2. The gunshot wound was very superficial, but I will need to look at the autopsy report and forensics from exhumation to refresh my memory on what was said.
3. If he was clearly in Somosa and Japan simultaneously, why is it that no one else can see it except Armstrong and his supporters? I don't see a lot of people jumping on board because of it - which should be the case if it was so clear cut. Or are you just being hyperbolic about how clear it is?
4. I agree he was impersonated in Mexico City -- but none of the photos seem to depict anyone who fits as an Oswald Doppelganger.
5. The trend I see is a trend of bending and twisting the evidence and around a pre-ordained theory, particularly zeroing in an anomalies that can by massaged into shape, as well as every single Oswald sighting in the records as valid, all propped up by the wackiest bunch of witnesses since Jehovah was knee-high to a prophet.