The Magic Tonsillectomy or Armstrong's Voodoo Science?

[Bob Prudhomme]

I have had limited time here since returning from vacation and this thread was begun while we were gone so I have not read most of it. Thus the comments below are from one of THE most respected JFK researchers in the world:

"The tonsillectomy topic all revolves around a single piece of paper in an FBI report, repeating third hand something that allegedly originated with Marguerite.

The John Armstrong faction adamantly insists that Marguerite is untrustworthy, and that FBI reports must be viewed with utmost skepticism. I wouldn't necessarily disagree.

Yet the same faction insists with equal adamance that this single piece of paper is genuine beyond doubt, despite the absence of corroboration from any source whatsoever.

"The FBI produced reams of fraudulent data with regards to the assassination of the president," according to a recent post by David Josephs. Yet the same man invokes a third hand citation from an FBI report as probative regarding the tonsillectomy. "

As this was a private email the senders id shall remain private. The purpose in posting it is the point is well worth considering, and sounds pretty decisive to me. Can't we just agree to disagree and get past all this nonsence. I mean really a ONE PAGE FBI report is causing this much discussion and sniping.
Dawn

My sentiments precisely, Dawn. If you look at the next thread down, you will see a thread by me, pretty much ignored, where I use FBI evidence to prove Oswald's ammo was incapable of the feats attributed to it. I'm working on a thread now that will pretty much prove CE 399 was never fired from the rifle found on the 6th floor, yet it is likely to generate little attention, either.

Yet, here we are, into the second week of a hot debate over Oswald's frickin' tonsils. Go figure!