11-12-2014, 02:42 PM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Scott, it was not only that EUINS was in ninth grade, it was all of the evidence in context, the WC took advantage of a confused teenager to press its agenda.Bob Mady Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:My real point about Amos Euins and the bald spot is, I've always wondered how you can see a bald spot, on a guy facing you, standing in relative shadow behind a half open window, from 6 floors down? I'm thinking Amos Euins may have acquired at least part of his description of the shooter, from viewing old Lovelady there on the street.EUINS was in ninth grade, do you really believe his testimony is reliable?
400 people looked to the GN to where the shots came from, EUINS had no idea and looked up, he may have seen the arms of NORMAN or WILLIAMS in the window, afterwards an imagination turned this into a rifle.
There was no shots fired from the TSBD.
The three men located 10 feet away disagree on shots being fired from the TSBD. NOT one of the three men claimed shots came from the SN or the sixth floor.
NORMAN claimed to hear huls hit the floor and the bolt on the rifle, but said nothing about a three 150 decibel sounds, supposedly 10 feet from his head.
They all agree that there were no sounds of any movement coming from the sixth floor.
Women located in a window 20 feet away indicated the shots came from the GN and one the court house.
To continue to speculate about shots coming from the sixth floor is folly.
Quote:EUINS was in ninth grade, do you really believe his testimony is reliable?
I'm not that sharp on the assassination as many if not all of you are, and I surly don't know half as much as everyone here, but am I to believe that what you're saying is that everyone or anyone who was in the ninth grade or younger should not be taken seriously because they are not credible?
I myself have a problem with that, Out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies you have prepared praise.
I myself would rather use my better understanding then to have someone influence what I should believe.