26-01-2015, 09:17 PM
At the heart of this thread is that there would be no way for the DPD to have known to position their Detective and the cutout unless they were aware of the 133-C pose before 11/29.
One of the negatives is lost with no explanation.
1st generation photos (supposedly) are found which means they came from a negative - yet another missing negative.
Stovall - one of the men doing the Paine search, and White a photographic expert who just started at the DPD in Oct 63 and quits to work for Page Drug store... http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/shaw/index.php?id=85336
While Herbert was also correct about the impossbility of wear marks being "exactly the same" the simply conclusion that these images existed prior to the assassination is fairly easy to prove using basic common sense.
You can't do a perfect cut-out of an image in 1963, if the image is supposedly unknown until 1977.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6621&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=6621&stc=1)
One of the negatives is lost with no explanation.
1st generation photos (supposedly) are found which means they came from a negative - yet another missing negative.
Stovall - one of the men doing the Paine search, and White a photographic expert who just started at the DPD in Oct 63 and quits to work for Page Drug store... http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/shaw/index.php?id=85336
While Herbert was also correct about the impossbility of wear marks being "exactly the same" the simply conclusion that these images existed prior to the assassination is fairly easy to prove using basic common sense.
You can't do a perfect cut-out of an image in 1963, if the image is supposedly unknown until 1977.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter