26-01-2015, 11:08 PM
David Josephs Wrote:At the heart of this thread is that there would be no way for the DPD to have known to position their Detective and the cutout unless they were aware of the 133-C pose before 11/29.
One of the negatives is lost with no explanation.
1st generation photos (supposedly) are found which means they came from a negative - yet another missing negative.
Stovall - one of the men doing the Paine search, and White a photographic expert who just started at the DPD in Oct 63 and quits to work for Page Drug store... http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/shaw/index.php?id=85336
While Herbert was also correct about the impossbility of wear marks being "exactly the same" the simply conclusion that these images existed prior to the assassination is fairly easy to prove using basic common sense.
You can't do a perfect cut-out of an image in 1963, if the image is supposedly unknown until 1977.
The DPD recovered three negatives and an unknown number of photographs showing three distinct scenes of Oswald in the backyard with his weapons and newspapers.
Presently, box 12, folder 3, item 1 of the Dallas Municipal Archives contains a 5 X 7 inch enlargement of 133-C.
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/40/4084-004.gif
The reverse side of this enlargement is stamped, "This photograph made and developed by the Bureau of Identification Police Department Dallas Texas."
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/40/4084-003.gif
An index of box 12 associates 133-C with a negative. In particular the title for item 1 of folder 3 reads as "Photograph of Oswald standing holding a rifle, negative number 91-001/082."
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/box12.htm
A search of the database produced one hit for this 91-001/082 number.
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/box12a.htm
The index of box 12A under item 1 of folder 37 reads as "Lee Harvey Oswald in back yard with rifle, negative number 91-001/082." Perhaps the author of this listing had a sense of humor. They noted that the scan of this missing negative is missing.