Definite proof the BYPs were faked - and who is Johnnie GRIZZAFFI and what did he say?

[Peter Lemkin]

At the heart of this thread is that there would be no way for the DPD to have known to position their Detective and the cutout unless they were aware of the 133-C pose before 11/29.

One of the negatives is lost with no explanation.
1st generation photos (supposedly) are found which means they came from a negative - yet another missing negative.

Stovall - one of the men doing the Paine search, and White a photographic expert who just started at the DPD in Oct 63 and quits to work for Page Drug store... http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/shaw/index.php?id=85336

While Herbert was also correct about the impossbility of wear marks being "exactly the same" the simply conclusion that these images existed prior to the assassination is fairly easy to prove using basic common sense.

You can't do a perfect cut-out of an image in 1963, if the image is supposedly unknown until 1977.

Peter Dale Scott has, among others, pointed out how a group within the DPD were connected with a National birthing of what evolved into COG, before called Rex-84 under Raygun, and unknown what it was called other than, generally, 'National Emergency Communications System' in 1963. I believe it was this network in DPD and some pals of theirs in Mil. Intel. in the Dallas area who were tasked with 'boots on the ground' for the big muck-a-mucks in DC, NYC, Miami, and elsewhere to do the 'hit'. It was the DPD intel division, I believe who cooked up the BYPs - sans Marina or Oswald [they were not in the picture - in pun form nor in real form]. So, they had the negatives and photos and knew all the variations, including some that have not yet become public - and could even create new ones at will. They know which positions their stand-in had made in the backyard. They had backyard [only] shots - from a camera on a tripod, and they had the model in various poses. The rest is child's play. They were salted around as needed, with a few trophy shots held by, for example, White and found by his ex. We have discussed this in a former thread on the BYPs. What is new are the Z and S name-doppelgangers; how do they fit into the mystery of the BYPs - if they indeed do? Sure would like to find that executive committee testimony, but if it followed the usual patterns of questioning, they'd have avoided getting to any questions which might evoke answers showing a conspiracy and a scenario other than the one they were given to paint.